These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17518274)

  • 1. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait?
    Reinbolt JA; Haftka RT; Chmielewski TL; Fregly BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):782-93. PubMed ID: 17518274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization.
    Reinbolt JA; Schutte JF; Fregly BJ; Koh BI; Haftka RT; George AD; Mitchell KH
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):621-6. PubMed ID: 15652563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of variability in body segment parameters on joint moment using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Nguyen TC; Reynolds KJ
    Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):346-53. PubMed ID: 24021524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of forelimb swing phase inverse dynamics to inertial parameter errors.
    Lanovaz JL; Clayton HM
    Equine Vet J Suppl; 2001 Apr; (33):27-31. PubMed ID: 11721563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of methods for estimating arm segment parameters and joint torques from inverse dynamics.
    Piovesan D; Pierobon A; Dizio P; Lackner JR
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031003. PubMed ID: 21303179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benchmarking of a full-body inertial motion capture system for clinical gait analysis.
    Cloete T; Scheffer C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4579-82. PubMed ID: 19163735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of different inertial parameter sets on joint moment calculation during stair ascending and descending.
    Fantozzi S; Stagni R; Cappello A; Leardini A
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jul; 27(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 15990070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of perturbing body segment parameters on calculated joint moments and muscle forces during gait.
    Wesseling M; de Groote F; Jonkers I
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 24332615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving net joint torque calculations through a two-step optimization method for estimating body segment parameters.
    Riemer R; Hsiao-Wecksler ET
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jan; 131(1):011007. PubMed ID: 19045923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consistent accuracy in whole-body joint kinetics during gait using wearable inertial motion sensors and in-shoe pressure sensors.
    Khurelbaatar T; Kim K; Lee S; Kim YH
    Gait Posture; 2015 Jun; 42(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 25957652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A sensitivity analysis method for the body segment inertial parameters based on ground reaction and joint moment regressor matrices.
    Futamure S; Bonnet V; Dumas R; Venture G
    J Biomech; 2017 Nov; 64():85-92. PubMed ID: 28947159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A computational model for dynamic analysis of the human gait.
    Vimieiro C; Andrada E; Witte H; Pinotti M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 24156601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainties in inverse dynamics solutions: a comprehensive analysis and an application to gait.
    Riemer R; Hsiao-Wecksler ET; Zhang X
    Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):578-88. PubMed ID: 17889542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global sensitivity analysis of the joint kinematics during gait to the parameters of a lower limb multi-body model.
    El Habachi A; Moissenet F; Duprey S; Cheze L; Dumas R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Jul; 53(7):655-67. PubMed ID: 25783762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Whole body inverse dynamics over a complete gait cycle based only on measured kinematics.
    Ren L; Jones RK; Howard D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2750-9. PubMed ID: 18672243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic study of the lower limb during the stance phase of gait using an homogeneous matrix approach.
    Doriot N; Chèze L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 14723490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving joint torque calculations: optimization-based inverse dynamics to reduce the effect of motion errors.
    Riemer R; Hsiao-Wecksler ET
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(7):1503-9. PubMed ID: 18396292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of body segments' parameters estimation models on inverse dynamics solutions during gait.
    Rao G; Amarantini D; Berton E; Favier D
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(8):1531-6. PubMed ID: 15970198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of body weight support variation on muscle activities during robot assisted gait: a dynamic simulation study.
    Hussain S; Jamwal PK; Ghayesh MH
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):626-635. PubMed ID: 28349768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient probabilistic methodology for incorporating uncertainty in body segment parameters and anatomical landmarks in joint loadings estimated from inverse dynamics.
    Langenderfer JE; Laz PJ; Petrella AJ; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Feb; 130(1):014502. PubMed ID: 18298193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.