188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17518675)
1. Repair and regeneration of the abdominal wall musculofascial defect using silk fibroin-chitosan blend.
Gobin AS; Butler CE; Mathur AB
Tissue Eng; 2006 Dec; 12(12):3383-94. PubMed ID: 17518675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Burns NK; Jaffari MV; Rios CN; Mathur AB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jan; 125(1):167-176. PubMed ID: 19910855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human versus non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix used for ventral hernia repair: comparison of in vivo fibrovascular remodeling and mechanical repair strength.
Campbell KT; Burns NK; Rios CN; Mathur AB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Jun; 127(6):2321-2332. PubMed ID: 21617466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction.
Butler CE; Prieto VG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):464-73. PubMed ID: 15277815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cross-linked and non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrices for ventral hernia repair.
Butler CE; Burns NK; Campbell KT; Mathur AB; Jaffari MV; Rios CN
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Sep; 211(3):368-76. PubMed ID: 20800194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Silk fibroin hydrogel as physical barrier for prevention of post hernia adhesion.
Konar S; Guha R; Kundu B; Nandi S; Ghosh TK; Kundu SC; Konar A; Hazra S
Hernia; 2017 Feb; 21(1):125-137. PubMed ID: 27038052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structural and mechanical characteristics of silk fibroin and chitosan blend scaffolds for tissue regeneration.
Gobin AS; Froude VE; Mathur AB
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Sep; 74(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 15983992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrated vs. freeze-dried human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: a comparison in a rabbit model.
Roth JS; Dexter DD; Lumpkins K; Bochicchio GV
Hernia; 2009 Apr; 13(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 19023639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regeneration of abdominal wall musculofascial defects by a human acellular collagen matrix.
Dufrane D; Mourad M; van Steenberghe M; Goebbels RM; Gianello P
Biomaterials; 2008 May; 29(14):2237-48. PubMed ID: 18281088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of human acellular dermal matrix for hernia repair: friend or foe?
Candage R; Jones K; Luchette FA; Sinacore JM; Vandevender D; Reed RL
Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):703-9; discussion 709-11. PubMed ID: 18847657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IFATS collection: Human adipose-derived stem cells seeded on a silk fibroin-chitosan scaffold enhance wound repair in a murine soft tissue injury model.
Altman AM; Yan Y; Matthias N; Bai X; Rios C; Mathur AB; Song YH; Alt EU
Stem Cells; 2009 Jan; 27(1):250-8. PubMed ID: 18818439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repair and reconstruction of a resected tumor defect using a composite of tissue flap-nanotherapeutic-silk fibroin and chitosan scaffold.
Gupta V; Mun GH; Choi B; Aseh A; Mildred L; Patel A; Zhang Q; Price JE; Chang D; Robb G; Mathur AB
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Sep; 39(9):2374-87. PubMed ID: 21706247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endothelial and stem cell interactions on dielectrophoretically aligned fibrous silk fibroin-chitosan scaffolds.
Gupta V; Davis G; Gordon A; Altman AM; Reece GP; Gascoyne PR; Mathur AB
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Aug; 94(2):515-23. PubMed ID: 20186770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mesh incisional herniorrhaphy increases abdominal wall elastic properties: a mechanism for decreased hernia recurrences in comparison with suture repair.
DuBay DA; Wang X; Adamson B; Kuzon WM; Dennis RG; Franz MG
Surgery; 2006 Jul; 140(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 16857438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Remodeling characteristics and biomechanical properties of a crosslinked versus a non-crosslinked porcine dermis scaffolds in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
Cavallo JA; Greco SC; Liu J; Frisella MM; Deeken CR; Matthews BD
Hernia; 2015 Apr; 19(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 23483265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.
Gruber-Blum S; Brand J; Keibl C; Fortelny RH; Redl H; Mayer F; Petter-Puchner AH
Hernia; 2017 Apr; 21(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 28012032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties of the abdominal wall and biomaterials utilized for hernia repair.
Deeken CR; Lake SP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():411-427. PubMed ID: 28692907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-assembly model, hepatocytes attachment and inflammatory response for silk fibroin/chitosan scaffolds.
She Z; Liu W; Feng Q
Biomed Mater; 2009 Aug; 4(4):045014. PubMed ID: 19671956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Regenerated silk fibroin (RSF) electrostatic spun fibre composite with polypropylene mesh for reconstruction of abdominal wall defects in a rat model.
Yang D; Song Z; Shen J; Song H; Yang J; Zhang P; Gu Y
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol; 2020 Dec; 48(1):425-434. PubMed ID: 31916462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevention of intestinal adhesion and regeneration of abdominal wall tissue with meshes containing an electrostatically spun acellular dermal matrix (ADM)/silk fibroin (SF) fiber composite polypropylene mesh.
Yang D; Song Z; Lin Y; Dong W; Fu S; Yang J; Zhang P; Gu Y
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Dec; 112():104087. PubMed ID: 32980670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
