These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17518767)

  • 1. Detailed comparison of the protein-ligand docking efficiencies of GOLD, a commercial package and ArgusLab, a licensable freeware.
    Joy S; Nair PS; Hariharan R; Pillai MR
    In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17518767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
    Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ParaDockS: a framework for molecular docking with population-based metaheuristics.
    Meier R; Pippel M; Brandt F; Sippl W; Baldauf C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):879-89. PubMed ID: 20415499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development.
    Geromichalos GD
    J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
    Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of eight docking tools for docking and virtual screening accuracy.
    Kellenberger E; Rodrigo J; Muller P; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(2):225-42. PubMed ID: 15340911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of shape complementarity in docking of unbound proteins.
    Norel R; Petrey D; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 1999 Aug; 36(3):307-17. PubMed ID: 10409824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient virtual screening using multiple protein conformations described as negative images of the ligand-binding site.
    Virtanen SI; Pentikäinen OT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1005-11. PubMed ID: 20504004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the performance of four molecular docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
    Li X; Li Y; Cheng T; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Aug; 31(11):2109-25. PubMed ID: 20127741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy assessment of protein-based docking programs against RNA targets.
    Li Y; Shen J; Sun X; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1134-46. PubMed ID: 20481574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
    Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW; Taylor RD
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):609-23. PubMed ID: 12910460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MolDock: a new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking.
    Thomsen R; Christensen MH
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 49(11):3315-21. PubMed ID: 16722650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.