285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17518798)
1. The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?
Bowie P; Cooke S; Lo P; McKay J; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 17518798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review.
McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.
McKay J; Pope L; Bowie P; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 19239594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safer pharmacy practice: a preliminary study of significant event analysis and peer feedback.
Bradley NA; Power A; Hesselgreaves H; McMillan F; Bowie P
Int J Pharm Pract; 2009 Oct; 17(5):283-91. PubMed ID: 20214270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audit and summative assessment: a criterion-referenced marking schedule.
Lough JR; McKay J; Murray TS
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Nov; 45(400):607-9. PubMed ID: 8554841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.
Grol R; Wensing M
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Oct; 45(399):548-52. PubMed ID: 7492425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. General practitioner trainees' experience of undertaking audit projects: preliminary report from the west of Scotland region.
McKay J; Lough JR; Murray TS
Br J Gen Pract; 1995 Jun; 45(395):301-3. PubMed ID: 7619585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Training for audit: lessons still to be learned.
Lough JR; Murray TS
Br J Gen Pract; 1997 May; 47(418):290-2. PubMed ID: 9219404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditing ophthalmology audits.
Tabandeh H; Thompson GM
Eye (Lond); 1995; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():1-5. PubMed ID: 8729011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External audit of clinical practice and medical decision making in a new Asian oncology center: results and implications for both developing and developed nations.
Shakespeare TP; Back MF; Lu JJ; Lee KM; Mukherjee RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Mar; 64(3):941-7. PubMed ID: 16297568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment.
Bowie P; McKay J; Dalgetty E; Lough M
Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Jun; 14(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 15933315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pilot study to develop and test a generic peer feedback instrument to review videotaped consultations in primary care.
McMillan R; Cameron N; Power A
Qual Prim Care; 2011; 19(6):347-54. PubMed ID: 22340897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tale of two audits: statistical process control for improving diabetes care in primary care settings.
Al-Hussein FA
Qual Prim Care; 2008; 16(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 18700079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: introducing education into regulatory assessment.
Wenghofer EF; Way D; Moxam RS; Wu H; Faulkner D; Klass DJ
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006; 26(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 16986145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acceptability and educational impact of a peer feedback model for significant event analysis.
McKay J; Shepherd A; Bowie P; Lough M
Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1210-7. PubMed ID: 19120952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving care or professional advantage? What makes clinicians do audit and how well do they fare?
Johnston G; Davies HT; Crombie IK
Health Bull (Edinb); 2000 Jul; 58(4):276-85. PubMed ID: 12813807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management criteria, documentation, and peer review of initial urinary tract infection.
Margileth AM; Thompson HC; Osborne CE
Pediatrics; 1976 May; 57(5):754-9. PubMed ID: 940715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audit of the Medical Audit Committee.
Parfrey PS; Gillespie M; McManamon PJ; Fisher R
CMAJ; 1986 Aug; 135(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 3730979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Summative assessment: a pilot project in the west of Scotland.
Campbell LM; Howie JG; Murray TS
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Oct; 43(375):430-4. PubMed ID: 8260223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
