776 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17518967)
1. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; Al-Zaher I
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
Mickenautsch S; Kopsala J; Rudolph MJ; Ogunbodede EO
SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Survival of single surface ART-restorations in Zimbabwe after 3 years].
Frencken JE
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Jun; 106(6):214-8. PubMed ID: 11930476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years.
Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van't Hof MA; Truin GJ; van Palenstein Helderman WH
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 12641593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival of ART and amalgam restorations in permanent teeth of children after 6.3 years.
Frencken JE; Taifour D; van 't Hof MA
J Dent Res; 2006 Jul; 85(7):622-6. PubMed ID: 16798862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survival rates of two atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) types in occlusal carious permanent teeth after two years.
Ibiyemi O; Bankole OO; Oke GA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 22195380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Caries preventive effect of occlusal sealant extension to ART restorations compared with non-extended amalgam restorations.
Frencken JE; van 't Hof MA; Taifour D
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2007; 5(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17366762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART). A special tissue preservative and patient-friendly approach].
Frencken JE
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Jun; 110(6):218-22. PubMed ID: 12852056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
Varpio M
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children.
Lo EC; Holmgren CJ; Hu D; van Palenstein Helderman W
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Oct; 35(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 17822487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.
Smales RJ; Yip HK
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 12073723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years.
Monse-Schneider B; Heinrich-Weltzien R; Schug D; Sheiham A; Borutta A
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 12641594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
