These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17519334)

  • 41. Study on the gravity movement and decoupling state of global energy-related CO
    Song Y; Zhang M
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 245():302-310. PubMed ID: 31158682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Using Kaya and LMDI models to analyze carbon emissions from the energy consumption in China.
    Yang P; Liang X; Drohan PJ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(21):26495-26501. PubMed ID: 32367238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Good enough tools for global warming policy making.
    Socolow RH; Lam SH
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2007 Apr; 365(1853):897-934. PubMed ID: 17272240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimating a social cost of carbon for global energy consumption.
    Rode A; Carleton T; Delgado M; Greenstone M; Houser T; Hsiang S; Hultgren A; Jina A; Kopp RE; McCusker KE; Nath I; Rising J; Yuan J
    Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7880):308-314. PubMed ID: 34646000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States.
    Gurney KR; Mendoza DL; Zhou Y; Fischer ML; Miller CC; Geethakumar S; de la Rue du Can S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jul; 43(14):5535-41. PubMed ID: 19708393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A hybrid study of multiple contributors to per capita household CO2 emissions (HCEs) in China.
    Qu J; Qin S; Liu L; Zeng J; Bian Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(7):6430-42. PubMed ID: 26620867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy.
    Wise M; Calvin K; Thomson A; Clarke L; Bond-Lamberty B; Sands R; Smith SJ; Janetos A; Edmonds J
    Science; 2009 May; 324(5931):1183-6. PubMed ID: 19478180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Feasibility of peaking carbon emissions of the power sector in China's eight regions: decomposition, decoupling, and prediction analysis.
    Wang Y; Su X; Qi L; Shang P; Xu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(28):29212-29233. PubMed ID: 31396871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Greenhouse gases: low methane leakage from gas pipelines.
    Lelieveld J; Lechtenböhmer S; Assonov SS; Brenninkmeijer CA; Dienst C; Fischedick M; Hanke T
    Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):841-2. PubMed ID: 15829951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Carbon emissions of infrastructure development.
    Müller DB; Liu G; Løvik AN; Modaresi R; Pauliuk S; Steinhoff FS; Brattebø H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Oct; 47(20):11739-46. PubMed ID: 24053762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Panel Cointegration Analysis for 16 Asian Countries.
    Lu WC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Nov; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 29165399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. People who live in green houses.
    Stetson M
    World Watch; 1991; 4(5):22-30. PubMed ID: 12343295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Empirical Analysis of Carbon Emission Accounting and Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption in China.
    Meng Z; Wang H; Wang B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30400644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Energy use and carbon dioxide emissions from cropland production in the United States, 1990-2004.
    Nelson RG; Hellwinckel CM; Brandt CC; West TO; De La Torre Ugarte DG; Marland G
    J Environ Qual; 2009; 38(2):418-25. PubMed ID: 19202012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions on the building/street scale for a large U.S. city.
    Gurney KR; Razlivanov I; Song Y; Zhou Y; Benes B; Abdul-Massih M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Nov; 46(21):12194-202. PubMed ID: 22891924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Energy intensity and the energy mix: what works for the environment?
    El Anshasy AA; Katsaiti MS
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Apr; 136():85-93. PubMed ID: 24568940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis.
    Li X; Liao H; Du YF; Wang C; Wang JW; Liu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(7):6814-6825. PubMed ID: 29264859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Impact of energy consumption and human activities on carbon emissions in Pakistan: application of STIRPAT model.
    Anser MK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 May; 26(13):13453-13463. PubMed ID: 30911964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
    Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
    Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Energy Structure and Energy Security under Climate Mitigation Scenarios in China.
    Matsumoto K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144884. PubMed ID: 26660094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.