These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17521754)

  • 1. Determining the impact of food price and income changes on body weight.
    Schroeter C; Lusk J; Tyner W
    J Health Econ; 2008 Jan; 27(1):45-68. PubMed ID: 17521754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food.
    Andreyeva T; Long MW; Brownell KD
    Am J Public Health; 2010 Feb; 100(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 20019319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased food energy supply as a major driver of the obesity epidemic: a global analysis.
    Vandevijvere S; Chow CC; Hall KD; Umali E; Swinburn BA
    Bull World Health Organ; 2015 Jul; 93(7):446-56. PubMed ID: 26170502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Welfare-Enhancing Technological Change and the Growth of Obesity.
    Lakdawalla D; Philipson T; Bhattacharya J
    Am Econ Rev; 2005 May; 95(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 29125263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: the case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax.
    Lin BH; Smith TA; Lee JY; Hall KD
    Econ Hum Biol; 2011 Dec; 9(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 21940223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intended and unintended consequences of a proposed national tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to combat the U.S. obesity problem.
    Dharmasena S; Capps O
    Health Econ; 2012 Jun; 21(6):669-94. PubMed ID: 21538676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis.
    Cabrera Escobar MA; Veerman JL; Tollman SM; Bertram MY; Hofman KJ
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Nov; 13():1072. PubMed ID: 24225016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential impact on obesity of a 10% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Ireland, an effect assessment modelling study.
    Briggs AD; Mytton OT; Madden D; O'Shea D; Rayner M; Scarborough P
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Sep; 13():860. PubMed ID: 24044370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Food prices and obesity: evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies.
    Powell LM; Chaloupka FJ
    Milbank Q; 2009 Mar; 87(1):229-57. PubMed ID: 19298422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling obesity in complex food systems: Systematic review.
    Bhatia A; Smetana S; Heinz V; Hertzberg J
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():1027147. PubMed ID: 36313777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A neurobehavioral study on the efficacy of price interventions in promoting healthy food choices among low socioeconomic families.
    Banerjee T; Chattaraman V; Zou H; Deshpande G
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):15435. PubMed ID: 32963284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seattle's minimum wage ordinance did not affect supermarket food prices by food processing category.
    Spoden AL; Buszkiewicz JH; Drewnowski A; Long MC; Otten JJ
    Public Health Nutr; 2018 Jun; 21(9):1762-1770. PubMed ID: 29409555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft drink prices, sales, body mass index and diabetes: Evidence from a panel of low-, middle- and high-income countries.
    Goryakin Y; Monsivais P; Suhrcke M
    Food Policy; 2017 Dec; 73():88-94. PubMed ID: 29276333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a UK Virtual Supermarket to Examine Purchasing Behavior Across Different Income Groups in the United Kingdom: Development and Feasibility Study.
    Mizdrak A; Waterlander WE; Rayner M; Scarborough P
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e343. PubMed ID: 28993301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting energy intakes against income shocks.
    von Hinke S; Leckie G
    J Econ Behav Organ; 2017 Sep; 141():210-232. PubMed ID: 28919654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deal or no deal? The prevalence and nutritional quality of price promotions among U.S. food and beverage purchases.
    Taillie LS; Ng SW; Xue Y; Harding M
    Appetite; 2017 Oct; 117():365-372. PubMed ID: 28705473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economics and obesity policy.
    Lusk JL
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2017 Jun; 41(6):831-834. PubMed ID: 28077861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulated Models Suggest That Price per Calorie Is the Dominant Price Metric That Low-Income Individuals Use for Food Decision Making.
    Beheshti R; Igusa T; Jones-Smith J
    J Nutr; 2016 Nov; 146(11):2304-2311. PubMed ID: 27655757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use and cumulation of evidence from modelling studies to inform policy on food taxes and subsidies: biting off more than we can chew?
    Shemilt I; Marteau TM; Smith RD; Ogilvie D
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Mar; 15():297. PubMed ID: 25881318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public perception and characteristics related to acceptance of the sugar-sweetened beverage taxation launched in France in 2012.
    Julia C; Méjean C; Vicari F; Péneau S; Hercberg S
    Public Health Nutr; 2015 Oct; 18(14):2679-88. PubMed ID: 25627337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.