924 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17522820)
1. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception.
Oeschger MP; Silva CE
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
Snow A
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological and biomedical aspects of genetically modified food.
Celec P; Kukucková M; Renczésová V; Natarajan S; Pálffy R; Gardlík R; Hodosy J; Behuliak M; Vlková B; Minárik G; Szemes T; Stuchlík S; Turna J
Biomed Pharmacother; 2005 Dec; 59(10):531-40. PubMed ID: 16298508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GM crops: science, politics and communication.
Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M
Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No Munich on GM crops.
Malvoisin P; Grausz JD
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Dec; 22(12):1501; discussion 1501. PubMed ID: 15583648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
Teng PP
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Genetically modified food (food derived from biotechnology): current and future trends in public acceptance and safety assessment].
Nishiura H; Imai H; Nakao H; Tsukino H; Kuroda Y; Katoh T
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12508467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Popular misconceptions: agricultural biotechnology.
McHughen A; Wager R
N Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 20359558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Europe sees sharp decline in GMO research.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):468-9. PubMed ID: 12721556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical reflections on herbicide-resistant crops.
Madsen KH; Sandøe P
Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15627240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
Vasil IK
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe.
Einsele A
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New Zealand backs GM technologies.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Sep; 19(9):792. PubMed ID: 11533620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Concern about Japan's unclear biotech regulations.
Watanabe KN
Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6924):689. PubMed ID: 12610594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is genetically modified crop the answer for the next green revolution?
Basu SK; Dutta M; Goyal A; Bhowmik PK; Kumar J; Nandy S; Scagliusi SM; Prasad R
GM Crops; 2010; 1(2):68-79. PubMed ID: 21865874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. USDA scrutinizes GM organism regulations.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):254-5. PubMed ID: 14990936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
