These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17522931)

  • 1. A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance.
    Narula VK; Watson WC; Davis SS; Hinshaw K; Needleman BJ; Mikami DJ; Hazey JW; Winston JH; Muscarella P; Rubin M; Patel V; Melvin WS
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2258-61. PubMed ID: 17522931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
    Dakin GF; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of precision and speed in laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgical task performance.
    Zihni A; Gerull WD; Cavallo JA; Ge T; Ray S; Chiu J; Brunt LM; Awad MM
    J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():29-33. PubMed ID: 29433882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures.
    Gallagher AG; Smith CD; Bowers SP; Seymour NE; Pearson A; McNatt S; Hananel D; Satava RM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Sep; 197(3):479-88. PubMed ID: 12946803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training.
    Feifer A; Al-Ammari A; Kovac E; Delisle J; Carrier S; Anidjar M
    BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108(10):1652-6; discussion 1657. PubMed ID: 21470359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.
    Van Sickle KR; McClusky DA; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Sep; 19(9):1227-31. PubMed ID: 16025195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of IQ, computer-gaming skills, general dexterity, and laparoscopic experience on performance with the da Vinci surgical system.
    Hagen ME; Wagner OJ; Inan I; Morel P
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 19455549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Installation of telerobotic surgery and initial experience with telerobotic radical prostatectomy.
    Costello AJ; Haxhimolla H; Crowe H; Peters JS
    BJU Int; 2005 Jul; 96(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 15963116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills.
    Sarle R; Tewari A; Shrivastava A; Peabody J; Menon M
    J Endourol; 2004 Feb; 18(1):63-6; discussion 66-7. PubMed ID: 15006057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of laparoscopic training to robotic proficiency.
    Angell J; Gomez MS; Baig MM; Abaza R
    J Endourol; 2013 Aug; 27(8):1027-31. PubMed ID: 23527871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of three laparoscopic modalities: robotics versus three-dimensional vision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy.
    LaGrange CA; Clark CJ; Gerber EW; Strup SE
    J Endourol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 18269320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
    Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D straight-stick laparoscopy versus 3D robotics for task performance in novice surgeons: a randomised crossover trial.
    Shakir F; Jan H; Kent A
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5380-5387. PubMed ID: 27059971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.
    Park YS; Oo AM; Son SY; Shin DJ; Jung DH; Ahn SH; Park DJ; Kim HH
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1485-90. PubMed ID: 26139502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy.
    Jourdan IC; Dutson E; Garcia A; Vleugels T; Leroy J; Mutter D; Marescaux J
    Br J Surg; 2004 Jul; 91(7):879-85. PubMed ID: 15227695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
    Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
    Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    van der Schatte Olivier RH; Van't Hullenaar CD; Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18855053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.