These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17522931)

  • 21. Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills Performance: 2D Versus 3D Vision and Classic Instrument Versus New Hand-Held Robotic Device for Laparoscopy.
    Leite M; Carvalho AF; Costa P; Pereira R; Moreira A; Rodrigues N; Laureano S; Correia-Pinto J; Vilaça JL; Leão P
    Surg Innov; 2016 Feb; 23(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 25994623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance.
    McDonough PS; Tausch TJ; Peterson AC; Brand TC
    J Robot Surg; 2011 Sep; 5(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 27637707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery.
    Suh I; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Siu KC
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Sep; 7(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 21688381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices.
    Passerotti CC; Franco F; Bissoli JC; Tiseo B; Oliveira CM; Buchalla CA; Inoue GN; Sencan A; Sencan A; do Pardo RR; Nguyen HT
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jul; 47(7):1075-84. PubMed ID: 25913053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotically assisted laparoscopy benefits surgical performance under stress.
    Moore LJ; Wilson MR; Waine E; McGrath JS; Masters RS; Vine SJ
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 26530839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance.
    Finnegan KT; Meraney AM; Staff I; Shichman SJ
    Urology; 2012 Aug; 80(2):330-5. PubMed ID: 22704177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Objective surgery -- advanced robotic devices and simulators used for surgical skill assessment].
    Suhánszki N; Haidegger T
    Magy Seb; 2014 Dec; 67(6):340-52. PubMed ID: 25500641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of environmental noise on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance.
    Siu KC; Suh IH; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Stergiou N
    Surgery; 2010 Jan; 147(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 19879611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modular comparison of laparoscopic and robotic simulation platforms in residency training: a randomized trial.
    Borahay MA; Haver MC; Eastham B; Patel PR; Kilic GS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):871-9. PubMed ID: 23811381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of novel robotic camera vs a standard laparoscopic camera.
    Strong VE; Hogle NJ; Fowler DL
    Surg Innov; 2005 Dec; 12(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16424951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robot-assisted laparoscopic skills development: formal versus informal training.
    Benson AD; Kramer BA; Boehler M; Schwind CJ; Schwartz BF
    J Endourol; 2010 Aug; 24(8):1351-5. PubMed ID: 20092410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study.
    Guru KA; Kuvshinoff BW; Pavlov-Shapiro S; Bienko MB; Aftab MN; Brady WE; Mohler JL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jan; 204(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 17189118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgeons' display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy.
    Moore LJ; Wilson MR; McGrath JS; Waine E; Masters RS; Vine SJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Sep; 29(9):2553-60. PubMed ID: 25427414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy and cervicosacropexy with the da Vinci® surgical system.
    Matthews CA
    Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():232-7. PubMed ID: 21082572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
    Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods.
    Hung AJ; Jayaratna IS; Teruya K; Desai MM; Gill IS; Goh AC
    BJU Int; 2013 Oct; 112(6):864-71. PubMed ID: 23470136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.
    Moorthy K; Munz Y; Dosis A; Hernandez J; Martin S; Bello F; Rockall T; Darzi A
    Surg Endosc; 2004 May; 18(5):790-5. PubMed ID: 15216862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy.
    Moore LJ; Wilson MR; Waine E; Masters RS; McGrath JS; Vine SJ
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Mar; 9(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 26530974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance.
    Ro CY; Toumpoulis IK; Ashton RC; Imielinska C; Jebara T; Shin SH; Zipkin JD; McGinty JJ; Todd GJ; Derose JJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():418-21. PubMed ID: 15718771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Virtual reality training followed by box training improves the laparoscopic skills of novice surgeons.
    Sumitani D; Egi H; Tokunaga M; Hattori M; Yoshimitsu M; Kawahara T; Okajima M; Ohdan H
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2013 Jun; 22(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 22950725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.