115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17523255)
1. The fourth estate and specialty hospitals.
McLean TR
Am Heart Hosp J; 2007; 5(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 17523255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The implications of reimbursement changes for specialty hospitals.
Zimmerman E
Healthc Financ Manage; 2006 Jul; 60(7):42-5. PubMed ID: 16869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective payment (DRGs): what will be the impact on cancer care?
Yasko JM; Fleck A
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1984; 11(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 6425810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Defending LTACs. Congress pressures CMS to revise admissions policy.
Tieman J
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jul; 34(29):14. PubMed ID: 15301140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Specialty hospitals: Congress should act to level the playing field.
Grassley C
Hosp Outlook; 2005; 8(2):13. PubMed ID: 16075770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Do specialty hospitals promote price competition?
Berenson RA; Bazzoli GJ; Au M
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2006 Jan; (103):1-4. PubMed ID: 16465700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicare program; payment for outpatient surgery at eye specialty hospitals and eye and ear specialty hospitals--HCFA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1990 Aug; 55(160):33697-700. PubMed ID: 10170586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specialty providers getting paid sooner.
Taravella S
Mod Healthc; 1991 Mar; 21(11):36-7. PubMed ID: 10109643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Specialty hospitals hang in the balance.
Pentecost MJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Oct; 2(10):812-5. PubMed ID: 17411938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Offering guidance. CMS clarifies exceptions to specialty hospital ban.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(12):4. PubMed ID: 15069892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The satellite lands inside. Some specialty inpatient providers save money on expansion by using space in other hospitals.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1999 Oct; 29(42):65-6, 68, 70. PubMed ID: 10623230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Specialty conflict. Lawmakers mull ban as CMS bows out.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(25):12. PubMed ID: 12858720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ban has fiscal repercussions.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2006 Mar; 36(10):17. PubMed ID: 16579427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reforms to revamp Medicare payments.
OR Manager; 2006 Sep; 22(9):5, 7. PubMed ID: 17009554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicaid program; limitations on aggregate payments to disproportionate share hospitals: federal fiscal year 1996--HCFA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1996 May; 61(91):21195-7. PubMed ID: 10158177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Catastrophic Act threatens long-stay hospitals.
Eubanks P
Hospitals; 1989 Jul; 63(13):72. PubMed ID: 2661405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Read and decide.
Love TP
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(4):1188-9. PubMed ID: 16835210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospitals see severity of situation. Specialty, rural facilities leery of CMS' DRG proposal.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(17):8-9. PubMed ID: 17477191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rehab backlash. As new regs take effect, lobbying mounts for update.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2004 Jul; 34(27):12-3. PubMed ID: 15279112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing payment refinements and reforms under Medicare for excluded hospitals.
Langenbrunner JC; Willis P; Jencks SF; Dobson A; Iezzoni L
Health Care Financ Rev; 1989; 10(3):91-107. PubMed ID: 10313100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
