BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17524499)

  • 1. The effect of the inter-phase delay interval in the spontaneous object recognition test for pigs.
    Kornum BR; Thygesen KS; Nielsen TR; Knudsen GM; Lind NM
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 17524499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detailed analysis of the behavior of Lister and Wistar rats in anxiety, object recognition and object location tasks.
    Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Bradford A; Ahmed S
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 159(2):247-66. PubMed ID: 15817188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spontaneous object recognition in the Göttingen minipig.
    Moustgaard A; Lind NM; Hemmingsen R; Hansen AK
    Neural Plast; 2002; 9(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 12959155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition memory in tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) after repeated familiarization sessions.
    Khani A; Rainer G
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jul; 90(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 22521708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 5-HT7 receptor: role in novel object discrimination and relation to novelty-seeking behavior.
    Ballaz SJ; Akil H; Watson SJ
    Neuroscience; 2007 Oct; 149(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 17869441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions.
    O'Brien N; Lehmann H; Lecluse V; Mumby DG
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 16580742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated scoring of novel object recognition in rats.
    Rutten K; Reneerkens OA; Hamers H; Sik A; McGregor IS; Prickaerts J; Blokland A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Jun; 171(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 18372047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do rats really express neophobia towards novel objects? Experimental evidence from exposure to novelty and to an object recognition task in an open space and an enclosed space.
    Ennaceur A; Michalikova S; Chazot PL
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 197(2):417-34. PubMed ID: 18992282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perirhinal cortex damage and anterograde object-recognition in rats after long retention intervals.
    Mumby DG; Piterkin P; Lecluse V; Lehmann H
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 185(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 17804090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter-manual transfer of object texture and shape in human neonates.
    Sann C; Streri A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):698-703. PubMed ID: 18006025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory.
    Hammond RS; Tull LE; Stackman RW
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 Jul; 82(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 15183168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sleep deprivation in the dark period does not impair memory in OF1 mice.
    Palchykova S; Winsky-Sommerer R; Tobler I
    Chronobiol Int; 2009 May; 26(4):682-96. PubMed ID: 19444749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrograde and anterograde object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions.
    Gaskin S; Tremblay A; Mumby DG
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(8):962-9. PubMed ID: 14750658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel object recognition and object location tasks in zebrafish: Influence of habituation and NMDA receptor antagonism.
    Gaspary KV; Reolon GK; Gusso D; Bonan CD
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 Nov; 155():249-260. PubMed ID: 30086397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new automated method to assess the rat recognition memory: validation of the method.
    Chambon C; Wegener N; Gravius A; Danysz W
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 222(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 21421012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociations in the effect of delay on object recognition: evidence for an associative model of recognition memory.
    Tam SK; Robinson J; Jennings DJ; Bonardi C
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 24000908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complementary and lateralized forms of processing in Bufo marinus for novel and familiar prey.
    Robins A; Rogers LJ
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2006 Sep; 86(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 16631392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term object location memory in rats: effects of sample phase and delay length in spontaneous place recognition test.
    Ozawa T; Yamada K; Ichitani Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jun; 497(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 21527315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-trial object recognition memory in the domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is disrupted by NMDA receptor antagonists.
    Hoffman KL; Basurto E
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 250():62-73. PubMed ID: 23651879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects.
    Bülthoff I; Newell FN
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 154():315-25. PubMed ID: 17010720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.