BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

425 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17524505)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests.
    Buckingham-Meyer K; Goeres DM; Hamilton MA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Aug; 70(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 17524505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants are more effective against
    Lineback CB; Nkemngong CA; Wu ST; Li X; Teska PJ; Oliver HF
    Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2018; 7():154. PubMed ID: 30568790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ruggedness and reproducibility of the MBEC biofilm disinfectant efficacy test.
    Parker AE; Walker DK; Goeres DM; Allan N; Olson ME; Omar A
    J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Jul; 102():55-64. PubMed ID: 24815513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tolerance of dormant and active cells in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 biofilm to antimicrobial agents.
    Kim J; Hahn JS; Franklin MJ; Stewart PS; Yoon J
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Jan; 63(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 19001451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fluorescent method for assessing the antimicrobial efficacy of disinfectant against Escherichia coli ATCC 35218 biofilm.
    Mariscal A; Carnero-Varo M; Gutierrez-Bedmar M; Garcia-Rodriguez A; Fernandez-Crehuet J
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(1):233-40. PubMed ID: 17786432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Petrifilm™ aerobic count plates as an equivalent alternative to drop plating on R2A agar plates in a biofilm disinfectant efficacy test.
    Fritz BG; Walker DK; Goveia DE; Parker AE; Goeres DM
    Curr Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 70(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 25471267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A laboratory hot tub model for disinfectant efficacy evaluation.
    Goeres DM; Loetterle LR; Hamilton MA
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Jan; 68(1):184-92. PubMed ID: 16949693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the modified Robbins device to study the in vitro biofilm removal efficacy of NitrAdine, a novel disinfecting formula for the maintenance of oral medical devices.
    Coenye T; De Prijck K; De Wever B; Nelis HJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Sep; 105(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 18341554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. IV. The AOAC use-dilution method and the Kelsey-Sykes test.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Feb; 192(5):432-7. PubMed ID: 1554401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. I. A comparison of three practical tests.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Dec; 190(5-6):479-91. PubMed ID: 2127890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. III. Practical tests for surface disinfection.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Dec; 190(5-6):500-10. PubMed ID: 2127892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fluorescent assay based on resazurin for detection of activity of disinfectants against bacterial biofilm.
    Mariscal A; Lopez-Gigosos RM; Carnero-Varo M; Fernandez-Crehuet J
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Mar; 82(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 19198831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Virucidal activity of a quaternary ammonium compound disinfectant against feline calicivirus: a surrogate for norovirus.
    Jimenez L; Chiang M
    Am J Infect Control; 2006 Jun; 34(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 16765204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to disinfection of a polymicrobial association contaminating the surface of elastomeric dental impressions.
    Giammanco GM; Melilli D; Rallo A; Pecorella S; Mammina C; Pizzo G
    New Microbiol; 2009 Apr; 32(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 19579694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The assessment of the bactericidal activity of surface disinfectants. II. Two other practical tests.
    Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 Dec; 190(5-6):492-9. PubMed ID: 2127891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Bactericidal efficacy of a disinfectant by AFNOR standards NF T 72-150 and NF T 72-151. A collaborative study].
    Chantefort A; Lellouche M
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1984 Jun; 32(5 Pt 2):623-7. PubMed ID: 6431382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluating the effect of quaternary ammonium disinfectants on bacterial strains of animal origin].
    Rueda J; Amigot Lázaro JA; Ducha J
    Rev Sci Tech; 2003 Dec; 22(3):1097-104. PubMed ID: 15005566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activity of disinfectants against multispecies biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Kart D; Tavernier S; Van Acker H; Nelis HJ; Coenye T
    Biofouling; 2014; 30(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 24579656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of growth temperature and surface type on the resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to disinfectants.
    Abdallah M; Khelissa O; Ibrahim A; Benoliel C; Heliot L; Dhulster P; Chihib NE
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Dec; 214():38-47. PubMed ID: 26233298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effectiveness of disinfectants from kinetic viewpoints].
    Hunger W; Höller C; Gundermann KO
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1990 May; 190(1-2):154-76. PubMed ID: 2118355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.