158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17525186)
1. Comparison of goblet cell density after femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome in LASIK.
Rodriguez AE; Rodriguez-Prats JL; Hamdi IM; Galal A; Awadalla M; Alio JL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2570-5. PubMed ID: 17525186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in the refractive index of the human corneal stroma during laser in situ keratomileusis. Effects of exposure time and method used to create the flap.
Patel S; Alió JL; Artola A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jul; 34(7):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18571072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.
Buzzonetti L; Petrocelli G; Valente P; Tamburrelli C; Mosca L; Laborante A; Balestrazzi E
Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18216572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis for consecutive hyperopia after radial keratotomy.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Sakla HF; Javaloy J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1183-9. PubMed ID: 17586373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Lim T; Yang S; Kim M; Tchah H
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 May; 141(5):833-9. PubMed ID: 16678504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual experiences during different stages of LASIK: Zyoptix XP microkeratome vs Intralase femtosecond laser.
Tan CS; Au Eong KG; Lee HM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jan; 143(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 17098206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incidence of diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with the IntraLase 15 kHz femtosecond laser and Moria M2 microkeratome.
Gil-Cazorla R; Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; Fuentes I
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18165077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.
Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE
Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser.
Mian SI; Shtein RM; Nelson A; Musch DC
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1190-4. PubMed ID: 17586374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Epi-LASIK and off-flap Epi-LASIK for the treatment of low and moderate myopia.
Kalyvianaki MI; Kymionis GD; Kounis GA; Panagopoulou SI; Grentzelos MA; Pallikaris IG
Ophthalmology; 2008 Dec; 115(12):2174-80. PubMed ID: 19041475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal architecture of femtosecond laser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
von Jagow B; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19101422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 microkeratome.
Muallem MS; Yoo SY; Romano AC; Schiffman JC; Culbertson WW
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1902-8. PubMed ID: 15342053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical investigation of off-flap epi-LASIK for moderate to high myopia.
Wang QM; Fu AC; Yu Y; Xu CC; Wang XX; Chen SH; Yu AY
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2390-4. PubMed ID: 18515581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of suction ring application during LASIK on goblet cell density.
Rodriguez-Prats JL; Hamdi IM; Rodriguez AE; Galal A; Alio JL
J Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 23(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 17598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of real-time intraocular pressure during laser in situ keratomileusis and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis in porcine eyes.
Hernández-Verdejo JL; de Benito-Llopis L; Teus MA
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 20202548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence, management, and visual outcomes of buttonholed laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.
Al-Mezaine HS; Al-Amro SA; Al-Obeidan S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):839-45. PubMed ID: 19393882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.
Hamilton DR; Johnson RD; Lee N; Bourla N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19027558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Confocal microscopy of corneal stroma and endothelium after LASIK and PRK.
Amoozadeh J; Aliakbari S; Behesht-Nejad AH; Seyedian MA; Rezvan B; Hashemi H
J Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 25(10 Suppl):S963-7. PubMed ID: 19848379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
