These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17525332)

  • 81. Protein kinases display minimal interpositional dependence on substrate sequence: potential implications for the evolution of signalling networks.
    Joughin BA; Liu C; Lauffenburger DA; Hogue CW; Yaffe MB
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Sep; 367(1602):2574-83. PubMed ID: 22889908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. The FHA domain protein ArnA functions as a global DNA damage response repressor in the hyperthermophilic archaeon
    Jiang Z; Lin Z; Gan Q; Wu P; Zhang X; Xiao Y; She Q; Ni J; Shen Y; Huang Q
    mBio; 2023 Aug; 14(4):e0094223. PubMed ID: 37389462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Site-specific phosphorylation dynamics of the nuclear proteome during the DNA damage response.
    Bennetzen MV; Larsen DH; Bunkenborg J; Bartek J; Lukas J; Andersen JS
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2010 Jun; 9(6):1314-23. PubMed ID: 20164059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Challenges to DNA replication in hypoxic conditions.
    Ng N; Purshouse K; Foskolou IP; Olcina MM; Hammond EM
    FEBS J; 2018 May; 285(9):1563-1571. PubMed ID: 29288533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. DNA mismatch repair and the DNA damage response.
    Li Z; Pearlman AH; Hsieh P
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2016 Feb; 38():94-101. PubMed ID: 26704428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Interactome Profiling of DNA Damage Response (DDR) Mediators with Immunoprecipitation-Mass Spectrometry.
    Law HC; Noe D; Woods NT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2701():185-197. PubMed ID: 37574483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Fitting ordinary differential equations to short time course data.
    Brewer D; Barenco M; Callard R; Hubank M; Stark J
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2008 Feb; 366(1865):519-44. PubMed ID: 17698469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. 3rd US-EU workshop: systems level understanding of DNA damage responses.
    Sander M; Begley TJ; Desaintes C; Gavin AC; Pelroy R; Pothof J; Shiloh Y; van Gent D; Van Houten B; Yaffe M; Mullenders L
    Mutat Res; 2010 Oct; 692(1-2):53-60. PubMed ID: 20727903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer.
    Smith J; Tho LM; Xu N; Gillespie DA
    Adv Cancer Res; 2010; 108():73-112. PubMed ID: 21034966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.
    Ciccia A; Elledge SJ
    Mol Cell; 2010 Oct; 40(2):179-204. PubMed ID: 20965415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation.
    Dephoure N; Zhou C; Villén J; Beausoleil SA; Bakalarski CE; Elledge SJ; Gygi SP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Aug; 105(31):10762-7. PubMed ID: 18669648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis.
    Olsen JV; Vermeulen M; Santamaria A; Kumar C; Miller ML; Jensen LJ; Gnad F; Cox J; Jensen TS; Nigg EA; Brunak S; Mann M
    Sci Signal; 2010 Jan; 3(104):ra3. PubMed ID: 20068231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease.
    Jackson SP; Bartek J
    Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7267):1071-8. PubMed ID: 19847258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. ATM-dependent and -independent dynamics of the nuclear phosphoproteome after DNA damage.
    Bensimon A; Schmidt A; Ziv Y; Elkon R; Wang SY; Chen DJ; Aebersold R; Shiloh Y
    Sci Signal; 2010 Dec; 3(151):rs3. PubMed ID: 21139141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Profiling of UV-induced ATM/ATR signaling pathways.
    Stokes MP; Rush J; Macneill J; Ren JM; Sprott K; Nardone J; Yang V; Beausoleil SA; Gygi SP; Livingstone M; Zhang H; Polakiewicz RD; Comb MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Dec; 104(50):19855-60. PubMed ID: 18077418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity.
    Cimprich KA; Cortez D
    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2008 Aug; 9(8):616-27. PubMed ID: 18594563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases.
    Maréchal A; Zou L
    Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2013 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 24003211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Proteomic investigations reveal a role for RNA processing factor THRAP3 in the DNA damage response.
    Beli P; Lukashchuk N; Wagner SA; Weinert BT; Olsen JV; Baskcomb L; Mann M; Jackson SP; Choudhary C
    Mol Cell; 2012 Apr; 46(2):212-25. PubMed ID: 22424773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: The Trinity at the Heart of the DNA Damage Response.
    Blackford AN; Jackson SP
    Mol Cell; 2017 Jun; 66(6):801-817. PubMed ID: 28622525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Quantitative Proteomic Atlas of Ubiquitination and Acetylation in the DNA Damage Response.
    Elia AE; Boardman AP; Wang DC; Huttlin EL; Everley RA; Dephoure N; Zhou C; Koren I; Gygi SP; Elledge SJ
    Mol Cell; 2015 Sep; 59(5):867-81. PubMed ID: 26051181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 108.