These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17526667)

  • 1. A study of the factors that influence consumer attitudes toward beef products using the conjoint market analysis tool.
    Mennecke BE; Townsend AM; Hayes DJ; Lonergan SM
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2639-59. PubMed ID: 17526667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork.
    Verbeke W; Pérez-Cueto FJ; Barcellos MD; Krystallis A; Grunert KG
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 20374787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 2. Meat quality, fatty acid composition, and overall palatability.
    Faucitano L; Chouinard PY; Fortin J; Mandell IB; Lafrenière C; Girard CL; Berthiaume R
    J Anim Sci; 2008 Jul; 86(7):1678-89. PubMed ID: 18375659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Niche marketing production practices for beef cattle in the United States and prevalence of foodborne pathogens.
    Fox JT; Reinstein S; Jacob ME; Nagaraja TG
    Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2008 Oct; 5(5):559-69. PubMed ID: 18681794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Production systems--an example from Brazil.
    Ferraz JB; Felício PE
    Meat Sci; 2010 Feb; 84(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 20374781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spanish, French and British consumers' acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers' beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price.
    Realini CE; Font i Furnols M; Sañudo C; Montossi F; Oliver MA; Guerrero L
    Meat Sci; 2013 Sep; 95(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The United States pork niche market phenomenon.
    Honeyman MS; Pirog RS; Huber GH; Lammers PJ; Hermann JR
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Aug; 84(8):2269-75. PubMed ID: 16864889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors associated with the purchase of designation of origin lamb meat.
    Sepúlveda WS; Maza MT; Mantecón AR
    Meat Sci; 2010 May; 85(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 20374881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phase I of The National Beef Quality Audit-2011: quantifying willingness-to-pay, best-worst scaling, and current status of quality characteristics in different beef industry marketing sectors.
    Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Pendell DL; Vedral LL; Mafi GG; Moore MC; McKeith RO; Gray GD; Griffin DB; Hale DS; Savell JW; Belk KE
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1907-19. PubMed ID: 23408805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of management and basic beef quality assurance practices on Idaho dairies.
    Glaze JB; Chahine M
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Mar; 92(3):1265-71. PubMed ID: 19233819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Economics of stocker production.
    Peel DS
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Jul; 22(2):271-96. PubMed ID: 16814017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of nutritional management on carcass merit of beef cattle and on sensory properties of beef.
    Schmidt TB; Olson KC
    Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2007 Mar; 23(1):151-63. PubMed ID: 17382845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
    García-Torres S; López-Gajardo A; Mesías FJ
    Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of feeding systems: feed cost, palatability and environmental impact among hay-fattened beef, consistent grass-only-fed beef and conventional marbled beef in Wagyu (Japanese Black cattle).
    Sithyphone K; Yabe M; Horita H; Hayashi K; Fumita T; Shiotsuka Y; Etoh T; Ebara F; Samadmanivong O; Wegner J; Gotoh T
    Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):352-9. PubMed ID: 21729217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Consumer expectations concerning the quality of food from animals].
    Pudel V
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1994 Jul; 101(7):255-8. PubMed ID: 7924957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consumers' willingness to pay for beef direct sales. A regional comparison across the Pyrenees.
    Sanjuán AI; Resano H; Zeballos G; Sans P; Panella-Riera N; Campo MM; Khliji S; Guerrero A; Oliver MA; Sañudo C; Santolaria P
    Appetite; 2012 Jun; 58(3):1118-27. PubMed ID: 22406841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Processing companies' preferences for attributes of beef in Switzerland.
    Boesch I
    Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):153-6. PubMed ID: 23896149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.