BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17526877)

  • 1. Test of APEX for nine forested watersheds in East Texas.
    Wang X; Saleh A; McBroom MW; Williams JR; Yin L
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):983-95. PubMed ID: 17526877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Water quality effects of clearcut harvesting and forest fertilization with best management practices.
    McBroom MW; Beasley RS; Chang M; Ice GG
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 18178884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of a turfgrass sod best management practice on water quality in a suburban watershed.
    Richards CE; Munster CL; Vietor DM; Arnold JG; White R
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 86(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 17298864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois.
    Lemke AM; Kirkham KG; Lindenbaum TT; Herbert ME; Tear TH; Perry WL; Herkert JR
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1215-28. PubMed ID: 21712591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling riverine nitrate export from an East-Central Illinois watershed using SWAT.
    Hu X; McIsaac GF; David MB; Louwers CA
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):996-1005. PubMed ID: 17526878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of regression methodology with low-frequency water quality sampling to estimate constituent loads for ephemeral watersheds in Texas.
    Toor GS; Harmel RD; Haggard BE; Schmidt G
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5):1847-54. PubMed ID: 18689746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nitrate and sediment fluxes from a California rangeland watershed.
    Lewis DJ; Singer MJ; Dahlgren RA; Tate KW
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(6):2202-11. PubMed ID: 17071890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impacts of fertilization on water quality of a drained pine plantation: a worst case scenario.
    Beltran BJ; Amatya DM; Youssef M; Jones M; Callahan TJ; Skaggs RW; Nettles JE
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):293-303. PubMed ID: 20048317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling sediment and nitrogen export from a rural watershed in eastern Canada using the soil and water assessment tool.
    Nafees Ahmad HM; Sinclair A; Jamieson R; Madani A; Hebb D; Havard P; Yiridoe EK
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1182-94. PubMed ID: 21712588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA.
    Meals DW; Hopkins RB
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 12079124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of nutrient budgets between three forested mountain watersheds on granite bedrock.
    Kunimatsu T; Hamabata E; Sudo M; Hida Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(7):129-40. PubMed ID: 11724478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sediment measurement and transport modeling: impact of riparian and filter strip buffers.
    Moriasi DN; Steiner JL; Arnold JG
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):807-14. PubMed ID: 21546666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of simulation mass balance modeling to estimate phosphorus and bacteria dynamics in watersheds.
    Cassell EA; Meals DW; Aschmann SG; Anderson DP; Rosen BH; Kort RL; Dorioz JM
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):157-66. PubMed ID: 12079098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nutrient loss and water quality under extensive grazing in the upper Burdekin river catchment, North Queensland.
    O'Reagain PJ; Brodie J; Fraser G; Bushell JJ; Holloway CH; Faithful JW; Haynes D
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2005; 51(1-4):37-50. PubMed ID: 15757706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydrologic and atrazine simulation of the Cedar Creek Watershed using the SWAT model.
    Larose M; Heathman GC; Norton LD; Engel B
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(2):521-31. PubMed ID: 17332256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applications of turbidity monitoring to forest management in California.
    Harris RR; Sullivan K; Cafferata PH; Munn JR; Faucher KM
    Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):531-43. PubMed ID: 17562100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A watershed-scale assessment of cost-effectiveness of sediment abatement with flow diversion terraces.
    Yang Q; Zhao Z; Benoy G; Chow TL; Rees HW; Bourque CP; Meng FR
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):220-7. PubMed ID: 20048309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the soil and water assessment tool to estimate achievable water quality targets through implementation of beneficial management practices in an agricultural watershed.
    Yang Q; Benoy GA; Chow TL; Daigle JL; Bourque CP; Meng FR
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 22218174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phosphorus and sediment loss in a catchment with winter forage grazing of cropland by dairy cattle.
    McDowell RW
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(2):575-83. PubMed ID: 16510702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agroforestry buffers for nonpoint source pollution reductions from agricultural watersheds.
    Udawatta RP; Garrett HE; Kallenbach R
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):800-6. PubMed ID: 21546665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.