BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17527087)

  • 1. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma.
    Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
    Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
    Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
    Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
    Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
    Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
    Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases.
    Amin MB; Paner GP; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Lyles RH; Moch H
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Dec; 32(12):1822-34. PubMed ID: 18813125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumor grade on outcome.
    Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Sukov WR; Thompson RH; Leibovich BC
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 22367296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Urinary collecting system invasion is an independent prognostic factor of organ confined renal cell carcinoma.
    Verhoest G; Avakian R; Bensalah K; Thuret R; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Tostain J; Guille F; Cindolo L; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L; Rioux-Leclercq N; Patard JJ
    J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):854-9. PubMed ID: 19616244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic ability of simplified nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma.
    Rioux-Leclercq N; Karakiewicz PI; Trinh QD; Ficarra V; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Tostain J; Zigeuner R; Mejean A; Patard JJ
    Cancer; 2007 Mar; 109(5):868-74. PubMed ID: 17262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinoma: comparison of growth kinetics and patient survival in 66 cases.
    Delahunt B; Eble JN; McCredie MR; Bethwaite PB; Stewart JH; Bilous AM
    Hum Pathol; 2001 Jun; 32(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 11431713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
    Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
    J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
    Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic significance of primary-tumor extension, stage and grade of nuclear differentiation in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
    Fiori E; De Cesare A; Galati G; Bononi M; D'Andrea N; Barbarosos A; Izzo L; Bolognese A
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Jun; 21(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 12148583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
    Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
    J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Bektas S; Bahadir B; Kandemir NO; Barut F; Gul AE; Ozdamar SO
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2009 Nov; 25(11):596-600. PubMed ID: 19858038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience.
    Patard JJ; Leray E; Rioux-Leclercq N; Cindolo L; Ficarra V; Zisman A; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Artibani W; Abbou CC; Lobel B; Guillé F; Chopin DK; Mulders PF; Wood CG; Swanson DA; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Apr; 23(12):2763-71. PubMed ID: 15837991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.