418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17529849)
21. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Advantages of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf children before 2 years of age when compared with later implantation.
Manrique M; Cervera-Paz FJ; Huarte A; Molina M
Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1462-9. PubMed ID: 15280727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):934-40. PubMed ID: 16864490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hearing preservation outcomes with different cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422.
Jurawitz MC; Büchner A; Harpel T; Schüssler M; Majdani O; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2014; 19(5):293-309. PubMed ID: 25277083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Otologics middle ear transducer with contralateral conventional hearing aid in severe sensorineural hearing loss: evolution during the first 24 months.
Tringali S; Perrot X; Berger P; Granade GL; Dubreuil C; Truy E
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jun; 31(4):630-6. PubMed ID: 20418795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of cochlear implant technology in sequentially bilaterally implanted adults.
Budenz CL; Roland JT; Babb J; Baxter P; Waltzman SB
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):731-5. PubMed ID: 19638940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.
Uziel AS; Sillon M; Vieu A; Artieres F; Piron JP; Daures JP; Mondain M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):615-28. PubMed ID: 17667770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A new electrode for residual hearing preservation in cochlear implantation: first clinical results.
Gstoettner W; Helbig S; Settevendemie C; Baumann U; Wagenblast J; Arnoldner C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Apr; 129(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 19140036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cochlear implants in elderly people: preliminary results.
Sterkers O; Mosnier I; Ambert-Dahan E; Herelle-Dupuy E; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Bouccara D
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 May; (552):64-7. PubMed ID: 15219050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant.
Gantz BJ; Turner C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 15224850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Buchman CA; Herzog JA; McJunkin JL; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Firszt JB; Kallogjeri D;
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Oct; 146(10):916-924. PubMed ID: 32857113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term assessment after implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge device.
Schmuziger N; Schimmann F; àWengen D; Patscheke J; Probst R
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 16436987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
