198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17529851)
1. Hydroxyapatite versus titanium ossiculoplasty.
Truy E; Naiman AN; Pavillon C; Abedipour D; Lina-Granade G; Rabilloud M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jun; 28(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 17529851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants.
Gelfand YM; Chang CY
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 144(6):954-8. PubMed ID: 21493321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short-term hearing results using ossicular replacement prostheses of hydroxyapatite versus titanium.
Lee JI; Yoo SH; Lee CW; Song CI; Yoo MH; Park HJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 272(10):2731-5. PubMed ID: 25193550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Effect of ossicular chain reconstruction with titanium ossicular replacement prosthesis in mastoidectomy with synchronous ossiculoplasty].
Mao M; Zhai J; Chen G; Zhang J; Ma Z; Xue J
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 28(10):708-11. PubMed ID: 25129971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Efficacy of ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium implants in single-stage tympanoplasty].
CHEN B; TAO DD
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 47(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 22800341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials.
Galy-Bernadoy C; Akkari M; Mathiolon C; Mondain M; Uziel A; Venail F
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2014 Nov; 131(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 24924117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes following ossicular chain reconstruction with composite prostheses: hydroxyapatite-polyethylene vs. hydroxyapatite-titanium.
Hahn Y; Bojrab DI
Ear Nose Throat J; 2013 Jun; 92(6):250, 252, 254 passim. PubMed ID: 23780591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies.
Neudert M; Zahnert T; Lasurashvili N; Bornitz M; Lavcheva Z; Offergeld C
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 19174710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing results with the titanium ossicular replacement prostheses.
Schmerber S; Troussier J; Dumas G; Lavieille JP; Nguyen DQ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 263(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 16328409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term results using Kurz titanium ossicular implants.
Vassbotn FS; Møller P; Silvola J
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 264(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 17082946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ossiculoplasty with total hydroxylapatite prostheses anatomical and functional outcomes.
Rondini-Gilli E; Grayeli AB; Borges Crosara PF; El Garem H; Mosnier I; Bouccara D; Sterkers O
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):543-7. PubMed ID: 12851543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hearing Outcomes after Ossicular Reconstruction with Removal of the Malleus.
Haberman RS; Salapatas AM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jan; 158(1):144-150. PubMed ID: 28849699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of surgery type and different ossiculoplasty materials on the hearing results in cholesteatoma surgery.
Şevik Eliçora S; Erdem D; Dinç AE; Damar M; Bişkin S
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 274(2):773-780. PubMed ID: 27837423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the effect of reconstructing the ossicular chain under otoendoscopy with and without a stapes superstructure.
Yang Y; Gui W; Wu C; Wu X
Acta Otolaryngol; 2024 Feb; 144(2):112-117. PubMed ID: 38436696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Titanium versus nontitanium ossicular prostheses-a randomized controlled study of the medium-term outcome.
Yung M; Smith P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):752-8. PubMed ID: 20502377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ossiculoplasty in intact stapes and malleus patients: a comparison of PORPs versus TORPs with malleus relocation and Silastic banding techniques.
Vincent R; Rovers M; Mistry N; Oates J; Sperling N; Grolman W
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 21765387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Kurz titanium prosthesis ossiculoplasty--follow-up statistical analysis of factors affecting one year hearing results.
Alaani A; Raut VV
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Apr; 37(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 19553041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hearing results with the Dornhoffer ossicular replacement prostheses.
Dornhoffer JL
Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):531-6. PubMed ID: 9546265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Checking the Placement of Ossicular Prostheses via the Posterior Tympanotomy Improve Hearing Results After Cholesteatoma Surgery?
Roux A; Bakhos D; Villeneuve A; Hermann R; Suy P; Lescanne E; Truy E
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Sep; 36(9):1499-503. PubMed ID: 26375972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiometric Outcomes Comparing Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Ossiculoplasty.
Sakai M; Killeen DE; Ma C; Newcomer M; Hunter JB; Isaacson B; Kutz JW
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Aug; 43(7):820-826. PubMed ID: 35802898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
