These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1752987)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Ciba Corning Biotrack 512 coagulation monitor for the control of oral anticoagulation.
    Jennings I; Luddington RJ; Baglin T
    J Clin Pathol; 1991 Nov; 44(11):950-3. PubMed ID: 1752987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of thromboplastin and coagulometer interaction on the precision of the International Normalised Ratio.
    Pi DW; Raboud JM; Filby C; Carter CJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 7706513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of use of low international sensitivity index thromboplastins in prothrombin time testing.
    Ts'ao C; Swedlund J; Neofotistos D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Dec; 118(12):1183-7. PubMed ID: 7979911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardizing the prothrombin time. Calibrating coagulation instruments as well as thromboplastin.
    Becker DM; Humphries JE; Walker FB; DeMong LK; Bopp JS; Acker MN
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jun; 117(6):602-5. PubMed ID: 8503731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An International Sensitivity Index (ISI) derived from patients with abnormal liver function improves agreement between INRs determined with different reagents.
    Sermon AM; Smith JM; Maclean R; Kitchen S
    Thromb Haemost; 2010 Apr; 103(4):757-65. PubMed ID: 20174759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standardization of coagulation tests.
    Opartkiattikul N
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():79-85. PubMed ID: 10926265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of five commercial thromboplastins: ISI re-evaluation on an automated coagulometer.
    Ford K; McArdle B; Kesteven PJ
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1995 Mar; 17(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7621627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a standard and a sensitive thromboplastin in monitoring low intensity oral anticoagulant therapy.
    Brophy MT; Fiore LD; Lau J; Goodwin R; Lopez A; Deykin D
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jul; 102(1):134-7. PubMed ID: 8037160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monitoring oral anticoagulant treatment with the TAS near-patient test system: comparison with conventional thromboplastins.
    Kitchen S; Preston FE
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Nov; 50(11):951-6. PubMed ID: 9462248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Home monitoring of warfarin therapy in children with a whole blood prothrombin time monitor.
    Massicotte P; Marzinotto V; Vegh P; Adams M; Andrew M
    J Pediatr; 1995 Sep; 127(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 7658268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of a portable monitor for prothrombin time determination, Coaguchek, with three systems for control of oral anticoagulant treatment.
    Vacas M; Lafuente PJ; Cuesta S; Iriarte JA
    Haemostasis; 1998; 28(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10461015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control and oral anticoagulation.
    Preston FE
    Thromb Haemost; 1995 Jul; 74(1):515-20. PubMed ID: 8578516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prothrombin times: an evaluation of four thromboplastins and four machines.
    Starr H; Rhoades P; Lam-Po-Tang PR; Archer GT
    Pathology; 1980 Oct; 12(4):567-74. PubMed ID: 7465253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prothrombin time and its standardization].
    Kagawa K
    Rinsho Byori; 2002 Aug; 50(8):779-85. PubMed ID: 12373814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of INRs after local calibration of thromboplastin international sensitivity indexes.
    McGlasson DL
    Clin Lab Sci; 2002; 15(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 12776770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrepant INR values: a comparison between Manchester and Thrombotest reagents using capillary and venous samples.
    Morrison M; Caldwell A; McQuaker G; Fitzsimons EJ
    Clin Lab Haematol; 1989; 11(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 2605880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A critical evaluation of the prothrombin time for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy.
    Jackson CM; Esnouf MP; Lindahl TL
    Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb; 2003; 33(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 12853712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a recombinant thromboplastin with Thrombotest for oral anticoagulant control.
    Baele G; Fiers T; Leroux-Roels G
    Haemostasis; 1996; 26(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 8698273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): field studies of coagulometer effects on the ISI of ECAA thromboplastins.
    Poller L; van den Besselaar AM; Jespersen J; Tripodi A; Houghton D
    Thromb Haemost; 1998 Oct; 80(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 9798981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The INR--a help or a hindrance to warfarin dosage?
    McQuaker G; Morrison M; Caldwell A; Fitzsimons EJ
    Scott Med J; 1990 Apr; 35(2):56-7. PubMed ID: 2374908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.