These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1753003)

  • 21. The rate of periodontal attachment loss in subjects with established periodontitis.
    Machtei EE; Norderyd J; Koch G; Dunford R; Grossi S; Genco RJ
    J Periodontol; 1993 Aug; 64(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 8410609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gingival attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe.
    Birek P; McCulloch CA; Hardy V
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Sep; 14(8):472-7. PubMed ID: 3308972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Probe penetration in relation to the connective tissue attachment level: influence of tine shape and probing force.
    Bulthuis HM; Barendregt DS; Timmerman MF; Loos BG; van der Velden U
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 May; 25(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 9650880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Comparative probing with an electronic and a manual periodontal probe].
    Becherer CF; Rateitschak KH; Hefti AF
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1993; 103(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 8322056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of pocket depth and attachment level measurements when using a flexible splint.
    Isidor F; Karring T; Attström R
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):662-8. PubMed ID: 6594353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Constant force probing with and without a stent in untreated periodontal disease: the clinical reproducibility problem and possible sources of error.
    Watts T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Aug; 14(7):407-11. PubMed ID: 3476518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two automated periodontal probes and two probes with a conventional readout in periodontal maintenance patients.
    Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 16553636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility of probing attachment level measurements.
    Badersten A; Nilvéus R; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Aug; 11(7):475-85. PubMed ID: 6589244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement using a constant-force electronic probe: analysis of inter- and intraexaminer variability.
    Araujo MW; Hovey KM; Benedek JR; Grossi SG; Dorn J; Wactawski-Wende J; Genco RJ; Trevisan M
    J Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 74(12):1736-40. PubMed ID: 14974813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical attachment level measurements with and without the use of a stent by a computerized electronic probe.
    Machion L; Andia DC; Nociti Júnior FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2007 Apr; 9(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 17506385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attachment level measurements with a constant force electronic probe.
    Magnusson I; Clark WB; Marks RG; Gibbs CH; Manouchehr-Pour M; Low SB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Mar; 15(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 3162465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants.
    Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D; Jacobs R; Schotte A; Darius P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 8597621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
    Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
    J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility of automated periodontal probing around teeth and osseointegrated oral implants.
    Christensen MM; Joss A; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):455-64. PubMed ID: 9555204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
    Eickholz P; Kim TS
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a new computerized cemento-enamel junction probe.
    Deepa R; Prakash S
    J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 16(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 22654322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy and reproducibility of two manual periodontal probes. An in vitro study.
    Buduneli E; Aksoy O; Köse T; Atilla G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):815-9. PubMed ID: 15367182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Periodontal disease activity: a development strategy for its investigation by means of accurate 3-dimensional clinical measurement.
    Watts TL; Beards Cf; Ewing PD; Leeman S
    J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 22(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 7790525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The periodontal probe and periodontal probing].
    Boutigny H
    Inf Dent; 1987 Nov; 69(41):3807-11, 3813, 3815 passim. PubMed ID: 3329637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.