These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17530328)

  • 1. A case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa.
    Winter SJ; Prozesky H; Esler KJ
    Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 40(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17530328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.
    Raymond CM; Brown G
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2513-23. PubMed ID: 21664035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program.
    Sorice MG; Haider W; Conner JR; Ditton RB
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 21488955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.
    Moon K; Cocklin C
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):493-503. PubMed ID: 21309851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.
    Pasquini L; Cowling RM; Twyman C; Wainwright J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 19843125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes.
    Jellinek S; Parris KM; Driscoll DA; Dwyer PD
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():69-76. PubMed ID: 23685119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of field edge habitat restoration on farms in California's Sacramento Valley.
    Garbach K; Long RF
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Mar; 189():134-141. PubMed ID: 28012388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating private land conservation in the Cape Lowlands, South Africa.
    Von Hase A; Rouget M; Cowling RM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1182-9. PubMed ID: 21182668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field sports and conservation in the United Kingdom.
    Oldfield TE; Smith RJ; Harrop SR; Leader-Williams N
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):531-3. PubMed ID: 12774120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
    Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A conjoint analysis of landholder preferences for reward-based land-management contracts in Kapingazi watershed, Eastern Mount Kenya.
    Balana BB; Yatich T; Mäkelä M
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2634-46. PubMed ID: 21700382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personal circumstances and social characteristics as determinants of landholder participation in biodiversity conservation programs.
    Moon K; Marshall N; Cocklin C
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():292-300. PubMed ID: 23064247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia.
    Januchowski-Hartley SR; Moon K; Stoeckl N; Gray S
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():20-6. PubMed ID: 22705856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cultural ecology of Whitethroat (Sylvia communis) habitat management by farmers: field-boundary vegetation in lowland England.
    Stoate C; Morris RM; Wilson JD
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Aug; 62(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 11505761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.