These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17531047)

  • 1. National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives.
    Miller RM; Rodríguez JP; Aniskowicz-Fowler T; Bambaradeniya C; Boles R; Eaton MA; Gärdenfors U; Keller V; Molur S; Walker S; Pollock C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):684-96. PubMed ID: 17531047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Building on IUCN regional red lists to produce lists of species of conservation priority: a model with Irish bees.
    Fitzpatrick U; Murray TE; Paxton RJ; Brown MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 17883497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
    Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.
    Brooke Mde L; Butchart SH; Garnett ST; Crowley GM; Mantilla-Beniers NB; Stattersfield AJ
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 18402584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The need to rationalize and prioritize threatening processes used to determine threat status in the IUCN Red List.
    Hayward MW
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1568-76. PubMed ID: 19508675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plants on the IUCN Red List: setting priorities to inform conservation.
    Schatz GE
    Trends Plant Sci; 2009 Nov; 14(11):638-42. PubMed ID: 19773196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National red listing beyond the 2010 target.
    Zamin TJ; Baillie JE; Miller RM; Rodríguez JP; Ardid A; Collen B
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1012-20. PubMed ID: 20337689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria.
    Keith DA; Mahony M; Hines H; Elith J; Regan TJ; Baumgartner JB; Hunter D; Heard GW; Mitchell NJ; Parris KM; Penman T; Scheele B; Simpson CC; Tingley R; Tracy CR; West M; Akçakaya HR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Jun; 28(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 24512339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation.
    Rodrigues AS; Pilgrim JD; Lamoreux JF; Hoffmann M; Brooks TM
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2006 Feb; 21(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 16701477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The status of chondrichthyan conservation in the Indo-Australasian region.
    White WT; Kyne PM
    J Fish Biol; 2010 Jun; 76(9):2090-117. PubMed ID: 20557656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the Red List Index for conservation assessment of Spanish vascular plants.
    Saiz JC; Lozano FD; Gómez MM; Baudet ÁB
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):910-9. PubMed ID: 25580521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conservation of terrestrial invertebrates: a review of IUCN and regional Red Lists for Myriapoda.
    Karam-Gemael M; Decker P; Stoev P; Marques MI; Jr AC
    Zookeys; 2020; 930():221-229. PubMed ID: 32390754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trend in the status of breeding bird fauna in British Columbia, Canada, based on the IUCN Red List Index method.
    Quayle JF; Ramsay LR; Fraser DF
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Oct; 21(5):1241-7. PubMed ID: 17883489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National responsibilities in European species conservation: a methodological review.
    Schmeller DS; Gruber B; Budrys E; Framsted E; Lengyel S; Henle K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 18577089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Status assessment of New Zealand's naturally uncommon ecosystems.
    Holdaway RJ; Wiser SK; Williams PA
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 22731663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the effectiveness of reserve acquisition programs in protecting rare and threatened species.
    Turner WR; Wilcove DS; Swain HM
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1657-69. PubMed ID: 17181801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extinction risk of the endemic vascular flora of Kauai, Hawaii, based on IUCN assessments.
    Rønsted N; Walsh SK; Clark M; Edmonds M; Flynn T; Heintzman S; Loomis A; Lorence D; Nagendra U; Nyberg B; Opgenorth M; Weisenberger L; Williams A; Wolkis D; Wood KR; Keir M
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):e13896. PubMed ID: 35146804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not knowing, not recording, not listing: numerous unnoticed mollusk extinctions.
    Régnier C; Fontaine B; Bouchet P
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1214-21. PubMed ID: 19459894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.