BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17531519)

  • 1. [The clinical value of ultrasound for endometrial receptivity assessment in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) procedures].
    Broussin B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jun; 35(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 17531519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurement of endometrial volume and endometrial thickness for assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive techniques].
    Kovachev E; Ganchev Zh; Cherneva S; Zokhav E; Shperberg A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44 Suppl 2():27-33. PubMed ID: 16028401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Silva Martins R; Helio Oliani A; Vaz Oliani D; Martinez de Oliveira J
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 31375113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review.
    Friedler S; Schenker JG; Herman A; Lewin A
    Hum Reprod Update; 1996; 2(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 9080229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The predictive value of serial serum estradiol and serial endometrial volume on endometrial receptivity on assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Silva Martins R; Helio Oliani A; Vaz Oliani D; Martinez de Oliveira J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):184. PubMed ID: 33673820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
    Hernández-Vargas P; Muñoz M; Domínguez F
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):264-301. PubMed ID: 32096829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Uterine receptivity and embryo implantation. The use of transvaginal scan and Doppler study in its evaluation in ART].
    Porcu G; Dechaud H; Hédon B
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Sep; 31(9):697-705. PubMed ID: 14499713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous endometrial volumetric analysis for endometrial receptivity assessment on assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Martins RS; Oliani AH; Oliani DV; de Oliveira JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):663. PubMed ID: 33143675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of endometrial and subendometrial vascularity measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.
    Ng EH; Chan CC; Tang OS; Yeung WS; Ho PC
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1612-7. PubMed ID: 16449309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound in assisted reproduction: a call to fill the endometrial gap.
    Hershko-Klement A; Tepper R
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun; 105(6):1394-1402.e4. PubMed ID: 27140291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Endometrial receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow, endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow.
    Schild RL; Knobloch C; Dorn C; Fimmers R; van der Ven H; Hansmann M
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Feb; 75(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 11172840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Administration of calcitonin promotes blastocyst implantation in mice by up-regulating integrin β3 expression in endometrial epithelial cells.
    Xiong T; Zhao Y; Hu D; Meng J; Wang R; Yang X; Ai J; Qian K; Zhang H
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3540-51. PubMed ID: 23001774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing receptivity in the endometrium: the need for a rapid, non-invasive test.
    Edgell TA; Rombauts LJ; Salamonsen LA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Nov; 27(5):486-96. PubMed ID: 23933033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technology.
    Senturk LM; Erel CT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 20(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 18460935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation.
    Diedrich K; Fauser BC; Devroey P; Griesinger G;
    Hum Reprod Update; 2007; 13(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 17548368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity.
    Paulson RJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Sep; 96(3):530-5. PubMed ID: 21880274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Color echo-Doppler and endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization].
    Ardaens Y; Leroy M; Lefebvre C; Tomas P; Leroy JL; Dewailly D
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998; 26(7-8):485-91. PubMed ID: 9810119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial receptivity: evaluation with ultrasound.
    Bonilla-Musoles F; Raga F; Osborne NG; Castillo JC; Bonilla F
    Ultrasound Q; 2013 Mar; 29(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 23435494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality of endometrial preparation].
    de Ziegler D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Aug; 37 Suppl 1():S30-3. PubMed ID: 18786467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fecundity disorders in older women: declines in follicular development and endometrial receptivity.
    Wang L; Lv S; Mao W; Bai E; Yang X
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jun; 20(1):115. PubMed ID: 32487204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.