323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17531696)
1. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up.
Crema AS; Walsh A; Yamane Y; Nosé W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1014-8. PubMed ID: 17531696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of coaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery.
Dosso AA; Cottet L; Burgener ND; Di Nardo S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18242455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining factors for corneal endothelial cell loss by using bimanual microincision phacoemulsification and power modulation.
Mathys KC; Cohen KL; Armstrong BD
Cornea; 2007 Oct; 26(9):1049-55. PubMed ID: 17893532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.
Can I; Takmaz T; Yildiz Y; Bayhan HA; Soyugelen G; Bostanci B
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 20457364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasound energy and endothelial cell loss with stop-and-chop and nuclear preslice phacoemulsification.
Pereira AC; Porfírio F; Freitas LL; Belfort R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1661-6. PubMed ID: 17010864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal wound architecture and integrity after phacoemulsification evaluation of coaxial, microincision coaxial, and microincision bimanual techniques.
Berdahl JP; DeStafeno JJ; Kim T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Mar; 33(3):510-5. PubMed ID: 17321403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of bimanual and micro-coaxial phacoemulsification with torsional ultrasound.
Wang Y; Xia Y; Liu X; Zheng D; Luo L; Liu Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 20163365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: Microincision versus standard technique.
Mencucci R; Ponchietti C; Virgili G; Giansanti F; Menchini U
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 16863974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of 3.0 mm incision coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery (MICS) on corneal thickness].
Wylegała E; Rebkowska-Juraszek M; Dobrowolski D; Woyna-Orlewicz A
Klin Oczna; 2009; 111(7-9):207-11. PubMed ID: 19899575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification.
Wilczynski M; Drobniewski I; Synder A; Omulecki W
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 17191184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postoperative corneal shape changes: microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery.
Hayashi K; Yoshida M; Hayashi H
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 19185236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
