BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17532051)

  • 1. The responsiveness of EQ-5D utility scores in patients with depression: A comparison with instruments measuring quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.
    Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
    J Affect Disord; 2008 Jan; 105(1-3):81-91. PubMed ID: 17532051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responsiveness of EQ-5D utility indices in alcohol-dependent patients.
    Günther OH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2008 Jan; 92(1-3):291-5. PubMed ID: 17888587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The EQ-5D in alcohol dependent patients: relationships among health-related quality of life, psychopathology and social functioning.
    Günther O; Roick C; Angermeyer MC; König HH
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2007 Jan; 86(2-3):253-64. PubMed ID: 16930855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders.
    König HH; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    Eur Psychiatry; 2007 Apr; 22(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 17142014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in inflammatory bowel disease in Germany.
    Stark RG; Reitmeir P; Leidl R; König HH
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2010 Jan; 16(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 19475674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The responsiveness of the EQ-5D and time trade-off scores in schizophrenia, affective disorders, and alcohol addiction.
    Sonntag M; König HH; Konnopka A
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Jul; 13():114. PubMed ID: 26530986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.
    Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D
    Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS in stroke patients.
    Golicki D; Niewada M; Karlińska A; Buczek J; Kobayashi A; Janssen MF; Pickard AS
    Qual Life Res; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1555-63. PubMed ID: 25425288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the EQ-5D in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.
    Bushnell DM; Martin ML; Ricci JF; Bracco A
    Value Health; 2006; 9(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 16626412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
    Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
    Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis: comparing the clinimetric properties of the Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5) and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D).
    Aubry G; Panel P; Thiollier G; Huchon C; Fauconnier A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 28383700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal.
    Lamu AN; Björkman L; Hamre HJ; Alræk T; Musial F; Robberstad B
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Apr; 19(1):125. PubMed ID: 33865400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).
    Gerhards SA; Huibers MJ; Theunissen KA; de Graaf LE; Widdershoven GA; Evers SM
    Value Health; 2011; 14(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 21839412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Health State Utility Measures in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
    Noel CW; Lee DJ; Kong Q; Xu W; Simpson C; Brown D; Gilbert RW; Gullane PJ; Irish JC; Huang SH; O'Sullivan B; Goldstein DP; de Almeida JR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):696-703. PubMed ID: 26204439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The validity of EQ-5D US preference weights in liver transplant candidates and recipients.
    Russell RT; Feurer ID; Wisawatapnimit P; Pinson CW
    Liver Transpl; 2009 Jan; 15(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 19109831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EQ-5D health utilities: exploring ways to improve upon responsiveness in psoriasis.
    Pickard AS; Gooderham M; Hartz S; Nicolay C
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jan; 20(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 27471948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of health state in patients with tinnitus: a comparison of the EQ-5D and HUI mark III.
    Maes IH; Joore MA; Cima RF; Vlaeyen JW; Anteunis LJ
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 21221004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: does choice of preference weights make a difference?
    Huang IC; Willke RJ; Atkinson MJ; Lenderking WR; Frangakis C; Wu AW
    Qual Life Res; 2007 Aug; 16(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17415683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D index from CDC's "Healthy Days" in a US sample.
    Jia H; Zack MM; Moriarty DG; Fryback DG
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):174-85. PubMed ID: 20375418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.