BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

671 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17532230)

  • 1. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
    Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial resolution of EEG cortical source imaging revealed by localization of retinotopic organization in human primary visual cortex.
    Im CH; Gururajan A; Zhang N; Chen W; He B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Mar; 161(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 17098289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source estimates for MEG/EEG visual evoked responses constrained by multiple, retinotopically-mapped stimulus locations.
    Hagler DJ; Halgren E; Martinez A; Huang M; Hillyard SA; Dale AM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1290-309. PubMed ID: 18570197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multivariate pattern analysis of MEG and EEG: A comparison of representational structure in time and space.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():441-454. PubMed ID: 28716718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian method through retinotopic brain activities reconstruction from fMRI and MEG signals.
    Yoshioka T; Toyama K; Kawato M; Yamashita O; Nishina S; Yamagishi N; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1397-413. PubMed ID: 18620066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    George JS; Aine CJ; Mosher JC; Schmidt DM; Ranken DM; Schlitt HA; Wood CC; Lewine JD; Sanders JA; Belliveau JW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):406-31. PubMed ID: 8576388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distributed analysis of simultaneous EEG-fMRI time-series: modeling and interpretation issues.
    Esposito F; Aragri A; Piccoli T; Tedeschi G; Goebel R; Di Salle F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Oct; 27(8):1120-30. PubMed ID: 19261423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Face-selective responses in combined EEG/MEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS).
    Hauk O; Rice GE; Volfart A; Magnabosco F; Ralph MAL; Rossion B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 242():118460. PubMed ID: 34363957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geometrical interpretation of fMRI-guided MEG/EEG inverse estimates.
    Ahlfors SP; Simpson GV
    Neuroimage; 2004 May; 22(1):323-32. PubMed ID: 15110022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates.
    Lin FH; Witzel T; Ahlfors SP; Stufflebeam SM; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):160-71. PubMed ID: 16520063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. fMRI-EEG integrated cortical source imaging by use of time-variant spatial constraints.
    Liu Z; He B
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(3):1198-214. PubMed ID: 18036833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal imaging reveals the spatiotemporal dynamics of recollection.
    Bergström ZM; Henson RN; Taylor JR; Simons JS
    Neuroimage; 2013 Mar; 68():141-53. PubMed ID: 23201363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integration of EEG source imaging and fMRI during continuous viewing of natural movies.
    Whittingstall K; Bartels A; Singh V; Kwon S; Logothetis NK
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Oct; 28(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 20579829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.