These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17532230)

  • 21. Spatiotemporal brain imaging of visual-evoked activity using interleaved EEG and fMRI recordings.
    Bonmassar G; Schwartz DP; Liu AK; Kwong KK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jun; 13(6 Pt 1):1035-43. PubMed ID: 11352609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Investigation of the Cerebral Cortex Using Magnetoencephalography(MEG)].
    Kakigi R
    Brain Nerve; 2015 Apr; 67(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 25846594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
    Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
    Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Cottereau BR; Ales JM; Norcia AM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():64-73. PubMed ID: 25088693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consistent and precise localization of brain activity in human primary visual cortex by MEG and fMRI.
    Moradi F; Liu LC; Cheng K; Waggoner RA; Tanaka K; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2003 Mar; 18(3):595-609. PubMed ID: 12667837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. High-resolution EEG (HR-EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG).
    Gavaret M; Maillard L; Jung J
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2015 Mar; 45(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 25648821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation.
    Darvas F; Pantazis D; Kucukaltun-Yildirim E; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S289-99. PubMed ID: 15501098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Similarity-Based Fusion of MEG and fMRI Reveals Spatio-Temporal Dynamics in Human Cortex During Visual Object Recognition.
    Cichy RM; Pantazis D; Oliva A
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Aug; 26(8):3563-3579. PubMed ID: 27235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Detection of epileptiform activity by human interpreters: blinded comparison between electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
    Iwasaki M; Pestana E; Burgess RC; Lüders HO; Shamoto H; Nakasato N
    Epilepsia; 2005 Jan; 46(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 15660769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new wavelet transform to sparsely represent cortical current densities for EEG/MEG inverse problems.
    Liao K; Zhu M; Ding L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 23706527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Magnetoencephalography for localizing and characterizing the epileptic focus.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():203-214. PubMed ID: 31277848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI.
    Inverso SA; Goh XL; Henriksson L; Vanni S; James AC
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 May; 37(5):1696-709. PubMed ID: 26870938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
    Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tracking cortical activity from M/EEG using graph cuts with spatiotemporal constraints.
    Gramfort A; Papadopoulo T; Baillet S; Clerc M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Feb; 54(3):1930-41. PubMed ID: 20933090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Modelling the magnetic signature of neuronal tissue.
    Blagoev KB; Mihaila B; Travis BJ; Alexandrov LB; Bishop AR; Ranken D; Posse S; Gasparovic C; Mayer A; Aine CJ; Ulbert I; Morita M; Müller W; Connor J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):137-48. PubMed ID: 17544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consistency and similarity of MEG- and fMRI-signal time courses during movie viewing.
    Lankinen K; Saari J; Hlushchuk Y; Tikka P; Parkkonen L; Hari R; Koskinen M
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():361-369. PubMed ID: 29486325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
    Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.