149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17533889)
21. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
Buchner A; Mehl B; Rothermund K; Wentura D
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 17128604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
Kattner F; Ellermeier W
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change.
Elliott EM
Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):478-87. PubMed ID: 12061768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
Schlittmeier SJ; Hellbrück J; Klatte M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 May; 61(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 18421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
Marsh JE; Jones DM
Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Serial recall of rhythms and verbal sequences: Impacts of concurrent tasks and irrelevant sound.
Hall D; Gathercole SE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1580-92. PubMed ID: 21563018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
LeCompte DC; Shaibe DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 9080790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and irrelevant tapping.
Surprenant AM; Neath I; Bireta TJ; Allbritton DW
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):141-9. PubMed ID: 18778142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall.
Beaman CP; Jones DM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 Aug; 51(3):615-36. PubMed ID: 9745380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. False memories through auditory distraction: When irrelevant speech produces memory intrusions in the absence of semantic interference.
Kattner F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; ():17470218241235654. PubMed ID: 38365601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
Saito S; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state.
Jones D; Madden C; Miles C
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 May; 44(4):645-69. PubMed ID: 1615168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The irrelevant speech effect in backward recall is modulated by foreknowledge of recall direction and response modality.
Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J
Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Sep; 75(3):245-260. PubMed ID: 33779189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
Buchner A; Rothermund K; Wentura D; Mehl B
Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):722-31. PubMed ID: 15552349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. What characterizes changing-state speech in affecting short-term memory? An EEG study on the irrelevant sound effect.
Schlittmeier SJ; Weisz N; Bertrand O
Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1669-80. PubMed ID: 22067074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The role of speech-specific properties of the background in the irrelevant sound effect.
Viswanathan N; Dorsi J; George S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 23883307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model?
Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):736-49. PubMed ID: 16060777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech versus non-speech as irrelevant sound: controlling acoustic variation.
Little JS; Martin FH; Thomson RH
Biol Psychol; 2010 Sep; 85(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20553792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
