These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Response-repetition effects depend on motor set: evidence for anatomical coding in response selection. Adam JJ; Koch I Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Feb; 33():172-84. PubMed ID: 24075691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Task shifting in dual-task settings. Hsieh S Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 12027331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Schneider DW; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations. Druey MD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. Gevers W; Verguts T; Reynvoet B; Caessens B; Fias W J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 16478324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Categorization difficulty modulates the mediated route for response selection in task switching. Schneider DW Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1958-1967. PubMed ID: 29274057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Task switching in video game players: Benefits of selective attention but not resistance to proactive interference. Karle JW; Watter S; Shedden JM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 20064634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability. Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect. Sellaro R; Treccani B; Job R; Cubelli R Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):950-62. PubMed ID: 25476998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training. Berryhill ME; Hughes HC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions. Müsseler J; Wühr P; Umiltá C Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 16184396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effects of recent practice on task switching. Yeung N; Monsell S J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Response force in probe reaction time tasks: reduction in capacity, response inhibition or bottle neck?]. Mattes S Z Exp Psychol; 2001; 48(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11486637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Poljac E; de Haan A; van Galen GP Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 17176657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does switching between strategies within the same task involve a cost? Luwel K; Schillemans V; Onghena P; Verschaffel L Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):753-71. PubMed ID: 19239730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed? Liefooghe B; Demanet J; Vandierendonck A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):850-7. PubMed ID: 19132632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. Waszak F; Wenke D; Brass M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17316534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]