These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results. Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation. Karabuda ZC; Abdel-Haq J; Arisan V Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):840-9. PubMed ID: 21198901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants. Strietzel FP; Reichart PA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Stavropoulos A; Karring T; Kostopoulos L Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 17224029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Pecora GE; Ceccarelli R; Bonelli M; Alexander H; Ricci JL Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 19212238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients. Friberg B; Jemt T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical analysis of wide-diameter frialit-2 implants. Krennmair G; Waldenberger O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):710-5. PubMed ID: 15508987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants. Aalam AA; Nowzari H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):793-8. PubMed ID: 16274156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces. Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Barewal RM; Oates TW; Meredith N; Cochran DL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 14579951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting. Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception. Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting late implant bone loss: a retrospective analysis. Chung DM; Oh TJ; Lee J; Misch CE; Wang HL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 17340905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs. Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Tawil G; Younan R Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):894-901. PubMed ID: 14696666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants: 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants. De Leonardis D; Garg AK; Pecora GE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):384-91. PubMed ID: 10379112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]