These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17535485)

  • 1. On the linearity of predefined and self-anchoring Visual Analogue Scales.
    Hofmans J; Theuns P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):401-13. PubMed ID: 17535485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How valid is the self-administered visual analogue scale for assessing the health status of elderly people?
    Kimura T; Hayashida K; Araki Y; Morita T; Yamaguchi N; Eboshida A
    Hiroshima J Med Sci; 2008 Dec; 57(3-4):85-92. PubMed ID: 19260560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of global testing procedures for item fit to the Rasch model.
    Suárez-Falcón JC; Glas CA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):127-43. PubMed ID: 12803827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?
    Stark S; Chernyshenko OS; Drasgow F; Williams BA
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Jan; 91(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 16435936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring nonlinear relations: models of clinical decision making by regression with optimal scaling.
    Hartmann A; Van Der Kooij AJ; Zeeck A
    Psychother Res; 2009 Jul; 19(4-5):482-92. PubMed ID: 20183402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric properties of the Doloplus-2 observational pain assessment scale and comparison to self-assessment in hospitalized elderly.
    Pautex S; Herrmann FR; Michon A; Giannakopoulos P; Gold G
    Clin J Pain; 2007; 23(9):774-9. PubMed ID: 18075404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability and reproducibility of numerical rating scales and visual analogue scales for canine pruritus severity scoring.
    Plant JD
    Vet Dermatol; 2007 Oct; 18(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 17845616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results.
    Wright DB
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2006 Sep; 76(Pt 3):663-75. PubMed ID: 16953968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A vertical VAS is a valid instrument for monitoring headache pain intensity.
    Lundqvist C; Benth JS; Grande RB; Aaseth K; Russell MB
    Cephalalgia; 2009 Oct; 29(10):1034-41. PubMed ID: 19735531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Coefficients of feasibility for ordinal response scales].
    Elosua Oliden P; Zumbo BD
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):896-901. PubMed ID: 18940100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Determining the most unfavourable variance to calculate the Measurement Scale Imprecision Factor, and extension to other types of sampling methods].
    Martínez García JA; Martínez Caro L
    Psicothema; 2008 May; 20(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 18413096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.
    Tecco S; D'Attilio M; Tetè S; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data.
    Reiser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):331-60. PubMed ID: 17535483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
    Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of three sensitivity measures in magnitude estimation tasks].
    Villarino Vivas A; Reales Avilés JM; Fontes de Gracia AI; Fontes de Gracia S
    Psicothema; 2008 May; 20(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 18413099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual analogue scales and assessment of quality of life in cancer.
    Hauser K; Walsh D
    J Support Oncol; 2008; 6(6):277-82. PubMed ID: 18724538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the consistency of individual classification using short scales.
    Emons WH; Sijtsma K; Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Mar; 12(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 17402814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of configural frequency analysis for explorative data analysis.
    Schrepp M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):59-73. PubMed ID: 16709279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual Analogue Scale to score the effects of Botulinum Toxin A treatment in children with cerebral palsy in daily clinical practice.
    Vles GF; de Louw AJ; Speth LA; van Rhijn LW; Janssen-Potten YJ; Hendriksen JG; Vles JS
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2008 May; 12(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 17933567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Application of four procedures for detecting differential item functioning in polytomous items].
    Elosua P; López-Jáuregui A
    Psicothema; 2007 May; 19(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 17425906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.