These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17535579)

  • 1. Decision making in the short and long run: repeated gambles and rationality.
    Aloysius JA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 17535579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.
    Huber O; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 17603987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Disjunction Effect in two-stage simulated gambles. An experimental study and comparison of a heuristic logistic, Markov and quantum-like model.
    Broekaert JB; Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Mar; 117():101262. PubMed ID: 31865226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.
    Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1516-23. PubMed ID: 16873105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pattern-setting for improving risky decision-making.
    Arfer KB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Jan; 119(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 36519972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When things don't add up: the role of perceived fungibility in repeated-play decisions.
    DeKay ML; Kim TG
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Sep; 16(9):667-72. PubMed ID: 16137250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct neuropsychological processes may mediate decision-making under uncertainty with known and unknown probability in gain and loss frames.
    Inukai K; Takahashi T
    Med Hypotheses; 2006; 67(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 16574332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision making and problem solving in adolescents who deliberately self-harm.
    Oldershaw A; Grima E; Jollant F; Richards C; Simic M; Taylor L; Schmidt U
    Psychol Med; 2009 Jan; 39(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18570698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expected utility violations evolve under status-based selection mechanisms.
    Dickson ES
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):650-4. PubMed ID: 18656491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple systems in decision making.
    Sanfey AG; Chang LJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():53-62. PubMed ID: 18469214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is a bird in the hand worth two in the future? The neuroeconomics of intertemporal decision-making.
    Kalenscher T; Pennartz CM
    Prog Neurobiol; 2008 Mar; 84(3):284-315. PubMed ID: 18207301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preference for oddity: uniqueness heuristic or hierarchical choice process?
    Waite TA
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Oct; 11(4):707-13. PubMed ID: 18528719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of payoffs and objective uncertainty on the latency and confidence of the subject's responses].
    Tiberghien G; Denhiere G; Verstiggel JC
    Annee Psychol; 1972; 72(2):319-36. PubMed ID: 4671384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perceived diversity heuristic: the case of pseudodiversity.
    Ayal S; Zakay D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):559-73. PubMed ID: 19254103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feelings not forgone: underestimating affective reactions to what does not happen.
    Andrade EB; Van Boven L
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 20483850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.