These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17535613)

  • 1. A comparison of the views of patients and medical staff in relation to the process of informed consent.
    Berry MG; Unwin J; Ross GL; Peacock E; Juma A
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 17535613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Informed consent for interventional radiology procedures: a survey detailing current European practice.
    O'Dwyer HM; Lyon SM; Fotheringham T; Lee MJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2003; 26(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 14753299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed consent: a patients' perspective.
    Burns P; Keogh I; Timon C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 Jan; 119(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 15807957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving comprehension of informed consent.
    Kusec S; Oresković S; Skegro M; Korolija D; Busić Z; Horzić M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Mar; 60(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 16427762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What a signature adds to the consent process.
    Neary P; Cahill RA; Kirwan WO; Kiely E; Redmond HP
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2698-704. PubMed ID: 18401652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' perception of the adequacy of informed consent: a pilot study of elective general surgical patients in Auckland.
    McKeague M; Windsor J
    N Z Med J; 2003 Mar; 116(1170):U355. PubMed ID: 12658314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' views of the consent process for adult cardiac surgery: questionnaire survey.
    Howlader MH; Dhanji AR; Uppal R; Magee P; Wood AJ; Anyanwu AC
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2004 Dec; 38(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15804804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent: what do patients want to know?
    Newton-Howes PA; Bedford ND; Dobbs BR; Frizelle FA
    N Z Med J; 1998 Sep; 111(1073):340-2. PubMed ID: 9785548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
    Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent for mastoidectomy: a patient's perspective.
    Mein E; Alaani A; Jones RV
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Dec; 34(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 17490835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient perspectives on informed consent for anaesthesia and surgery: American attitudes.
    Burkle CM; Pasternak JJ; Armstrong MH; Keegan MT
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Mar; 57(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 23228008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The changing face of informed surgical consent.
    Oosthuizen JC; Burns P; Timon C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2012 Mar; 126(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 22051081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Satisfying the needs of Japanese cancer patients: a comparative study of detailed and standard informed consent documents.
    Sato K; Watanabe T; Katsumata N; Sato T; Ohashi Y
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 24408900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cataract surgery and consent; recall, anxiety, and attitude toward trainee surgeons preoperatively and postoperatively.
    Vallance JH; Ahmed M; Dhillon B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jul; 30(7):1479-85. PubMed ID: 15210226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancing informed consent best practices: gaining patient, family and provider perspectives using reverse simulation.
    Goldfarb E; Fromson JA; Gorrindo T; Birnbaum RJ
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Sep; 38(9):546-51. PubMed ID: 22522147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment.
    Vermeulen E; Schmidt MK; Aaronson NK; Kuenen M; van der Valk P; Sietses C; van den Tol P; van Leeuwen FE
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Mar; 62(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 19017681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent and knee arthroscopies: an evaluation of patient understanding and satisfaction.
    McGaughey I
    Knee; 2004 Jun; 11(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 15194102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How informed is patient consent to interventional cardiology procedures. A quality assurance survey by the nurses].
    Steffenino G; Aimar F; Bogetti M; Dutto MS; Dutto M; Lice G; Mogna A; Tomatis M; Conte L
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2005 Jan; 6(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 15776730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Assessment of the quality and psychological impact of information delivered using official consent forms in digestive endoscopy].
    Roque I; Hochain P; Merle V; Lerebours E; Hecketsweiler P; Ducrotté P
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2003 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 12594361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.