These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17537135)

  • 1. Understanding clinical trial outcomes: design, analysis, and interpretation.
    Jacobe HT; Leitenberger JJ; Bergstresser PR
    Dermatol Ther; 2007; 20(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 17537135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A review of the limitations of statistical analysis of treatment outcomes used in periodontal research.
    Galgut PN
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 5(4):92-7. PubMed ID: 14604057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Poor reporting of quality of life outcomes in dermatology randomized controlled clinical trials.
    Le Cleach L; Chassany O; Levy A; Wolkenstein P; Chosidow O
    Dermatology; 2008; 216(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 18032899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A primer on the design, conduct, and interpretation of clinical trials.
    Appel LJ
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Nov; 1(6):1360-7. PubMed ID: 17699370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculation of quality adjusted life years in the published literature: a review of methodology and transparency.
    Richardson G; Manca A
    Health Econ; 2004 Dec; 13(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 15386669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Roaming through methodology. XXV. Outcome measures, surrogate outcomes, and intermediate measures].
    Boers M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Oct; 144(41):1949-52. PubMed ID: 11048558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.
    Revicki D; Hays RD; Cella D; Sloan J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18177782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
    Akobeng AK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice.
    Khuder SA; Kahaleh B
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study design: statistical and methodologic considerations.
    Rubenfeld GD
    Respir Care; 1995 Sep; 40(9):980-6. PubMed ID: 10152244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life in clinical trials on allergy: a GA(2)LEN taskforce position paper.
    Baiardini I; Bousquet PJ; Brzoza Z; Canonica GW; Compalati E; Fiocchi A; Fokkens W; van Wijk RG; La Grutta S; Lombardi C; Maurer M; Pinto AM; Ridolo E; Senna GE; Terreehorst I; Bom AT; Bousquet J; Zuberbier T; Braido F;
    Allergy; 2010 Mar; 65(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 19930232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The clinical significance of new therapies for the management of periodontal disease.
    Van Dyke TE
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 7(4 Suppl):191-6. PubMed ID: 16248275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological issues in treatment effectiveness and outcomes research.
    Mark BA; Salyer J
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1999; 3(1):12-8; quiz 18-9. PubMed ID: 9934193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How can we assess outcomes of clinical trials: the MCID approach.
    Make B
    COPD; 2007 Sep; 4(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 17729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evidence provided by a single trial is less reliable than its statistical analysis suggests.
    Borm GF; Lemmers O; Fransen J; Donders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 62(7):711-715.e1. PubMed ID: 19171462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The randomized controlled trial.
    Stel VS; Zoccali C; Dekker FW; Jager KJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2009; 113(4):c337-42. PubMed ID: 19752576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient test for the analysis of dichotomized variables when the reliability is known.
    Borm GF; Munneke M; Lemmers O; van Zuijlen M
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3498-510. PubMed ID: 16981185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery and traumatology: overview of parameters and pitfalls.
    Soucacos PN; Johnson EO; Babis G
    Injury; 2008 Jun; 39(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 18533154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the cumulative proportion of responders analysis graph to present pain data over a range of cut-off points: making clinical trial data more understandable.
    Farrar JT; Dworkin RH; Max MB
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2006 Apr; 31(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 16632085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.