These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17538514)

  • 1. Population-based outreach for Chlamydia screening in men: results from a randomized trial.
    Scholes D; Heidrich FE; Yarbro P; Lindenbaum JE; Marrazzo JM
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Nov; 34(11):837-9. PubMed ID: 17538514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mailed urine samples are not an effective screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis case finding among young men.
    Domeika M; Oscarsson L; Hallén A; Hjelm E; Sylvan S
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Jul; 21(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 17567309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population-based strategies for outreach screening of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Andersen B; Olesen F; Møller JK; Østergaard L
    J Infect Dis; 2002 Jan; 185(2):252-8. PubMed ID: 11807700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
    van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia.
    Spasovski MS; Simjanovska LJ; Taleski V; Petrova N; Lazetic L; Popeska Z; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC; Efremov GD
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlamydia trachomatis among young Norwegian men: sexual behavior and genitourinary symptoms.
    Bakken IJ; Skjeldestad FE; Halvorsen TF; Thomassen T; Størvold G; Nordbø SA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Apr; 34(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 16924179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to reach non-clinic populations with mailed self-administered vaginal swabs.
    Gaydos CA; Dwyer K; Barnes M; Rizzo-Price PA; Wood BJ; Flemming T; Hogan MT
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):451-7. PubMed ID: 16652069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
    van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial of strategies to increase chlamydia screening in young women.
    Scholes D; Grothaus L; McClure J; Reid R; Fishman P; Sisk C; Lindenbaum JE; Green B; Grafton J; Thompson RS
    Prev Med; 2006 Oct; 43(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 16782182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis: results from the first national population-based survey in France.
    Goulet V; de Barbeyrac B; Raherison S; Prudhomme M; Semaille C; Warszawski J;
    Sex Transm Infect; 2010 Aug; 86(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20660590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring STI prevalence using telephone surveys and mailed urine specimens: a pilot test.
    Eggleston E; Turner CF; Rogers SM; Roman A; Miller WC; Villarroel MA; Ganapathi L
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Jun; 81(3):236-8. PubMed ID: 15923293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Swedish cost-effectiveness analysis of community-based Chlamydia trachomatis PCR testing of postal urine specimens obtained at home.
    Novak DP; Lindholm L; Jonsson M; Karlsson RB
    Scand J Public Health; 2004; 32(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 15513664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project.
    Martin L; Freedman E; Burton L; Rutter S; Knight V; D'Amato A; Murray C; Drysdale J; Harvey S; McNulty A
    Sex Health; 2009 Jun; 6(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 19457296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention.
    Blake DR; Gaydos CA; Quinn TC
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lessons learned from a population-based chlamydia screening pilot.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):826-30. PubMed ID: 17212860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The check is in the mail: piloting a novel approach to Chlamydia trachomatis testing using self-collected, mailed specimen.
    Buhrer-Skinner M; Muller R; Bialasiewicz S; Sloots TP; Debattista J; Gordon R; Buettner PG
    Sex Health; 2009 Jun; 6(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 19457297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
    Andersen B; Gundgaard J; Kretzschmar M; Olsen J; Welte R; Oster-Gaard L
    Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):407-15. PubMed ID: 16601656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.
    Senok A; Wilson P; Reid M; Scoular A; Craig N; McConnachie A; Fitzpatrick B; MacDonald A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Mar; 59(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 15709078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design.
    Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Horner PJ; Roberts TE; Campbell R; Herring A; Skidmore S; Sanford E; Sterne JA; Davey Smith G; Graham A; Huengsberg M; Ross J; Egger M
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):342-8. PubMed ID: 15459400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.