These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17538548)

  • 1. Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs.
    Almenoff JS; Pattishall EN; Gibbs TG; DuMouchel W; Evans SJ; Yuen N
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Aug; 82(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 17538548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety monitoring of new anti-malarials in immediate post-marketing phase.
    Edwards IR
    Med Trop (Mars); 1998; 58(3 Suppl):93-6. PubMed ID: 10212911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Disproportionality Analysis of Post-marketing Case Reports be Used for Comparison of Drug Safety Profiles?
    Michel C; Scosyrev E; Petrin M; Schmouder R
    Clin Drug Investig; 2017 May; 37(5):415-422. PubMed ID: 28224371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A primer of drug safety surveillance: an industry perspective. Part III: Managing adverse-event data.
    Allan MC
    J Pharm Technol; 1992; 8(6):259-73. PubMed ID: 10122649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postmarketing surveillance of potentially fatal reactions to oncology drugs: potential utility of two signal-detection algorithms.
    Hauben M; Reich L; Chung S
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Dec; 60(10):747-50. PubMed ID: 15619136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative performance of two quantitative safety signalling methods: implications for use in a pharmacovigilance department.
    Almenoff JS; LaCroix KK; Yuen NA; Fram D; DuMouchel W
    Drug Saf; 2006; 29(10):875-87. PubMed ID: 16970511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of statistical signal detection procedures in eudravigilance post-authorization data: a retrospective evaluation of the potential for earlier signalling.
    Alvarez Y; Hidalgo A; Maignen F; Slattery J
    Drug Saf; 2010 Jun; 33(6):475-87. PubMed ID: 20486730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postmarketing hepatic adverse event experience with PEGylated/non-PEGylated drugs: a disproportionality analysis.
    Hauben M; Vegni F; Reich L; Younus M
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Nov; 19(11):934-41. PubMed ID: 18049161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combining multiple healthcare databases for postmarketing drug and vaccine safety surveillance: why and how?
    Trifirò G; Coloma PM; Rijnbeek PR; Romio S; Mosseveld B; Weibel D; Bonhoeffer J; Schuemie M; van der Lei J; Sturkenboom M
    J Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 275(6):551-61. PubMed ID: 24635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Safety of medicinal products and reporting of adverse drug reactions].
    Skibicka I; Maciejczyk A
    Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2004; 38(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 15654675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical and graphical approaches for disproportionality analysis of spontaneously-reported adverse events in pharmacovigilance.
    Zink RC; Huang Q; Zhang LY; Bao WJ
    Chin J Nat Med; 2013 May; 11(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 23725848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outliers and patients with adverse drug reactions.
    Edwards IR
    Drug Saf; 2009; 32(8):623-4. PubMed ID: 19591527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evolving paradigms in pharmacovigilance.
    Brewster W; Gibbs T; Lacroix K; Murray A; Tydeman M; Almenoff J
    Curr Drug Saf; 2006 May; 1(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 18690923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Leveraging the entire cohort in drug safety monitoring: part 1 methods for sequential surveillance that use regression adjustment or weighting to control confounding in a multisite, rare event, distributed data setting.
    Nelson JC; Ulloa-Pérez E; Bobb JF; Maro JC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 112():77-86. PubMed ID: 31108199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated signal generation in prescription-event monitoring.
    Heeley E; Wilton LV; Shakir SA
    Drug Saf; 2002; 25(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 12071779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal selection and follow-up in pharmacovigilance.
    Meyboom RH; Lindquist M; Egberts AC; Edwards IR
    Drug Saf; 2002; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 12071784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative methods in pharmacovigilance: focus on signal detection.
    Hauben M; Zhou X
    Drug Saf; 2003; 26(3):159-86. PubMed ID: 12580646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmaco-vigilance.
    Almenoff J; Tonning JM; Gould AL; Szarfman A; Hauben M; Ouellet-Hellstrom R; Ball R; Hornbuckle K; Walsh L; Yee C; Sacks ST; Yuen N; Patadia V; Blum M; Johnston M; Gerrits C; Seifert H; Lacroix K
    Drug Saf; 2005; 28(11):981-1007. PubMed ID: 16231953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The state of adverse event reporting and signal generation of dietary supplements in Korea.
    Park KS; Kwon O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Jun; 57(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 20074608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Illusions of objectivity and a recommendation for reporting data mining results.
    Hauben M; Reich L; Gerrits CM; Younus M
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 May; 63(5):517-21. PubMed ID: 17364192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.