These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539266)

  • 1. Training of nurses in ear examination and hearing screening in the school setting.
    Gloria-Cruz TL; Chiong CM; Chan AL; Llanes EG; Reyes-Quintos MR; Abes GT
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2007 Jan; 38(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 17539266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rinne test: does the tuning fork position affect the sound amplitude at the ear?
    Butskiy O; Ng D; Hodgson M; Nunez DA
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Mar; 45():21. PubMed ID: 27013057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss.
    Miltenburg DM
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Aug; 23(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 7996624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice.
    Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for hearing loss and middle-ear effusion in school-age children, using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a feasibility study.
    Georgalas C; Xenellis J; Davilis D; Tzangaroulakis A; Ferekidis E
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Dec; 122(12):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18423079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of unilateral referrals on neonatal hearing screening.
    Chang KW; O-Lee TJ; Price M
    J Med Screen; 2009; 16(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 19349526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development, initial reliability and validity testing of an observational tool for assessing technical skills of operating room nurses.
    Sevdalis N; Undre S; Henry J; Sydney E; Koutantji M; Darzi A; Vincent CA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Sep; 46(9):1187-93. PubMed ID: 19403133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Tuning fork study in deafness. Thus function Rinne and Weber tests].
    Ziemer C
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Apr; 148(15):18. PubMed ID: 16711196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuning fork decay.
    Miller GW
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Mar; 89(3):459-72. PubMed ID: 431250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying deficits in nurses' training in ear care.
    Langford S
    Community Nurse; 2001 Jan; 6(12):9-10, 13. PubMed ID: 11982066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pilot study of a high-frequency school-based hearing screen to detect adolescent hearing loss.
    Sekhar DL; Zalewski TR; Ghossaini SN; King TS; Rhoades JA; Czarnecki B; Grounds S; Deese B; Barr AL; Paul IM
    J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 24523012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C; Perotti M; Beltrame MA; Giarbini N
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health professionals' readiness for infant hearing screening in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Olusanya B; Somefun A; Eletu O; Olude O; Odusote O
    East Afr Med J; 2006 Feb; 83(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 16708884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school.
    Lancaster P; Krumm M; Ribera J; Klich R
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18840705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The otologist's tuning fork examination--are you striking it correctly?
    Stevens JR; Pfannenstiel TJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Mar; 152(3):477-9. PubMed ID: 25475500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. School hearing screening programme in the UK: practice and performance.
    Fonseca S; Forsyth H; Neary W
    Arch Dis Child; 2005 Feb; 90(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 15665168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing loss in Mozambique: current data from Inhambane Province.
    Clark JL
    Int J Audiol; 2008; 47 Suppl 1():S49-56. PubMed ID: 18781514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Implementation of tuning fork hearing tests using electronic devices].
    Ponizov AG; Meshcheriakov RV
    Med Tekh; 2012; (1):36-9. PubMed ID: 22442951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.