611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539462)
1. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of lymphoedema more than five years after breast cancer treatment.
Lopez Penha TR; Slangen JJ; Heuts EM; Voogd AC; Von Meyenfeldt MF
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1059-63. PubMed ID: 21937192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of the Inverse Water Volumetry Method to Measure the Volume of the Upper Limb.
Beek MA; te Slaa A; van der Laan L; Mulder PG; Rutten HJ; Voogd AC; Luiten EJ; Gobardhan PD
Lymphat Res Biol; 2015 Jun; 13(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 26091408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability.
Devoogdt N; Lemkens H; Geraerts I; Van Nuland I; Flour M; Coremans T; Christiaens MR; Van Kampen M
Int Angiol; 2010 Oct; 29(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 20924341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement Between Optoelectronic Volumetry and Circumferential Girth Measurements to Diagnose Lymphedema in Patients Submitted to Axillary Radical Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma.
Campanholi LL; Baiocchi JMT; Batista BN; Bergmann A; Fregnani JHTG; Duprat Neto JP
Lymphat Res Biol; 2021 Dec; 19(6):568-572. PubMed ID: 33555979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement.
McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Incidence and risk factors of lymphedema in women after surgery for breast cancer].
Doś J; Gutowski P; Górska-Doś M
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2009; 55(2):30-4. PubMed ID: 20349609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hand volume estimates based on a geometric algorithm in comparison to water displacement.
Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Hill CJ; Hernandez T; Greenshner A; Diep H
Lymphology; 2006 Jun; 39(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 16910100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement Properties of Instruments for Measuring of Lymphedema: Systematic Review.
Hidding JT; Viehoff PB; Beurskens CH; van Laarhoven HW; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW; van der Wees PJ
Phys Ther; 2016 Dec; 96(12):1965-1981. PubMed ID: 27340195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of lymphedema in patients with breast cancer undergoing axillary lymph node dissection in Hong Kong.
Mak SS; Yeo W; Lee YM; Mo KF; Tse KY; Tse SM; Ho FP; Kwan WH
Nurs Res; 2008; 57(6):416-25. PubMed ID: 19018216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
