337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539463)
1. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Operational equivalence of bioimpedance indices and perometry for the assessment of unilateral arm lymphedema.
Ward LC; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2009; 7(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 19522677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population.
Armer JM; Stewart BR
Lymphat Res Biol; 2005; 3(4):208-17. PubMed ID: 16379589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of bioimpedance analysis to evaluate lymphedema.
Warren AG; Janz BA; Slavin SA; Borud LJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):541-3. PubMed ID: 17452840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema.
Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E
Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of volume displacement versus circumferential arm measurements for lymphoedema: implications for the SNAC trial.
Tewari N; Gill PG; Bochner MA; Kollias J
ANZ J Surg; 2008 Oct; 78(10):889-93. PubMed ID: 18959643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of symptomatic seroma on lymphedema symptoms following breast cancer treatment.
Fu MR; Guth AA; Cleland CM; Lima ED; Kayal M; Haber J; Gallup L; Axelrod D
Lymphology; 2011 Sep; 44(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 22165584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation among bioimpedance analysis, sonographic and circumferential measurement in assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema.
Choi YH; Seo KS
Lymphology; 2014 Sep; 47(3):123-33. PubMed ID: 25420305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single frequency versus bioimpedance spectroscopy for the assessment of lymphedema.
York SL; Ward LC; Czerniec S; Lee MJ; Refshauge KM; Kilbreath SL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Sep; 117(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18563555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of lymphedema and arm symptoms on quality of life in breast cancer survivors.
Hormes JM; Bryan C; Lytle LA; Gross CR; Ahmed RL; Troxel AB; Schmitz KH
Lymphology; 2010 Mar; 43(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 20552814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Airplane travel and lymphedema: a case study.
Ward LC; Battersby KJ; Kilbreath SL
Lymphology; 2009 Sep; 42(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 19927904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
