These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539581)

  • 1. Ultrasonic characterization of the mechanical properties and polymerization reaction of acrylic-based bone cements.
    Dunne NJ; Xu Y; Makem J; Orr I
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Apr; 221(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 17539581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the small-punch test as a technique for characterizing the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement.
    Dunne NJ; Leonard D; Daly C; Buchanan FJ; Orr JF
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Jan; 220(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 16459442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical evaluation of pulse-echo ultrasonic test method for the determination of setting and mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement: influence of mixing technique.
    Hagan CP; Orr JF; Mitchell CA; Dunne NJ
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Feb; 56():279-86. PubMed ID: 25260486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study on modelling of PMMA bone cement polymerisation.
    Stańczyk M
    J Biomech; 2005 Jul; 38(7):1397-403. PubMed ID: 15922750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a new composite PMMA-HA/Brushite bone cement for spinal augmentation.
    Aghyarian S; Rodriguez LC; Chari J; Bentley E; Kosmopoulos V; Lieberman IH; Rodrigues DC
    J Biomater Appl; 2014 Nov; 29(5):688-98. PubMed ID: 25085810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [In vitro studies on various PMMA bone cements: a first comparison of new materials for arthroplasty].
    Kock HJ; Huber FX; Hillmeier J; Jäger R; Volkmann R; Handschin AE; Letsch R; Meeder PJ
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 18324591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A procedure and criterion for bone cement fracture toughness tests.
    Guandalini L; Baleani M; Viceconti M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 15648668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcement of bone cement using zirconia fibers with and without acrylic coating.
    Kotha S; Li C; Schmid S; Mason J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Mar; 88(4):898-906. PubMed ID: 18384160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of oligo(trimethylene carbonate) addition on the stiffness of acrylic bone cement.
    Persson C; López A; Fathali H; Hoess A; Rojas R; Ott MK; Hilborn J; Engqvist H
    Biomatter; 2016; 6(1):e1133394. PubMed ID: 26727581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensile characteristics of ten commercial acrylic bone cements.
    Harper EJ; Bonfield W
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Sep; 53(5):605-16. PubMed ID: 10984711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flow characteristics of curing polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1998; 212(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 9695639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of the monomer-to-powder ratio on the material properties of acrylic bone cement.
    Belkoff SM; Sanders JC; Jasper LE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 12115746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ultrasonic pulse-echo technique for monitoring the setting of CaSO4-based bone cement.
    Carlson J; Nilsson M; Fernández E; Planell JA
    Biomaterials; 2003 Jan; 24(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 12417180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of large amounts of gentamicin sulphate into acrylic bone cement: effect on handling and mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation.
    Dunne NJ; Hill J; McAfee P; Kirkpatrick R; Patrick S; Tunney M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Apr; 222(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 18491704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthopaedic bone cement: do we know what we are using?
    Bridgens J; Davies S; Tilley L; Norman P; Stockley I
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 May; 90(5):643-7. PubMed ID: 18450633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two methods of fatigue testing bone cement.
    Tanner KE; Wang JS; Kjellson F; Lidgren L
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Mar; 6(3):943-52. PubMed ID: 19766742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro study investigating the mechanical properties of acrylic bone cement containing calcium carbonate nanoparticles.
    Hill J; Orr J; Dunne N
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Nov; 19(11):3327-33. PubMed ID: 18500449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative measurement of the stresses induced during polymerisation of bone cement.
    Roques A; Browne M; Taylor A; New A; Baker D
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4415-24. PubMed ID: 15046932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acrylic bone cements: influence of time and environment on physical properties.
    Nottrott M
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2010 Jun; 81(341):1-27. PubMed ID: 20486859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the shrinkage of commercial bone cements when mixed under vacuum.
    Kwong FN; Power RA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jan; 88(1):120-2. PubMed ID: 16365134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.