These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539586)

  • 1. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a composite tibia.
    Gray HA; Zavatsky AB; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Apr; 221(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 17539586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Integrated Musculoskeletal-Finite-Element Model to Evaluate Effects of Load Carriage on the Tibia During Walking.
    Xu C; Silder A; Zhang J; Hughes J; Unnikrishnan G; Reifman J; Rakesh V
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Oct; 138(10):. PubMed ID: 27437640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and experimental validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the human scapula.
    Gupta S; van der Helm FC; Sterk JC; van Keulen F; Kaptein BL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 15116900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-finite element simulation of trabecular-bone post-yield behaviour--effects of material model, element size and type.
    Verhulp E; Van Rietbergen B; Muller R; Huiskes R
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Aug; 11(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 18568833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties.
    Yosibash Z; Tal D; Trabelsi N
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2010 Jun; 368(1920):2707-23. PubMed ID: 20439270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculation of tibial loading using strain gauges.
    Funk JR; Crandall JR
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():160-5. PubMed ID: 16817602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains.
    Morgan EF; Bayraktar HH; Yeh OC; Majumdar S; Burghardt A; Keaveny TM
    J Biomech; 2004 Sep; 37(9):1413-20. PubMed ID: 15275849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a finite element model of the human metacarpal.
    Barker DS; Netherway DJ; Krishnan J; Hearn TC
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Mar; 27(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15642506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Jan; 14(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 24777672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental validation of finite element model for proximal composite femur using optical measurements.
    Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Amin Yavari S; Weinans H; Jurvelin JS; Zadpoor AA; Isaksson H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():86-94. PubMed ID: 23510970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional finite element models of the human pubic symphysis with viscohyperelastic soft tissues.
    Li Z; Alonso JE; Kim JE; Davidson JS; Etheridge BS; Eberhardt AW
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 34(9):1452-62. PubMed ID: 16897423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia.
    Completo A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Oct; 129(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 17887906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Smooth surface micro finite element modelling of a cancellous bone analogue material.
    Leung SY; Browne M; New AM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jan; 222(1):145-9. PubMed ID: 18335725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subject-specific finite element analysis of the human medial collateral ligament during valgus knee loading.
    Gardiner JC; Weiss JA
    J Orthop Res; 2003 Nov; 21(6):1098-106. PubMed ID: 14554224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element prediction of surface strain and fracture strength at the distal radius.
    Edwards WB; Troy KL
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 21840240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.