290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539710)
1. Inter-implant bone height changes in anterior maxillary immediate and non-immediate adjacent dental implants.
Kupershmidt I; Levin L; Schwartz-Arad D
J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 17539710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest.
Tarnow DP; Cho SC; Wallace SS
J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):546-9. PubMed ID: 10807116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scalloped dental implants: a retrospective analysis of radiographic and clinical outcomes of 17 NobelPerfect implants in 6 patients.
Nowzari H; Chee W; Yi K; Pak M; Chung WH; Rich S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16681488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study.
Galindo-Moreno P; Fernández-Jiménez A; Avila-Ortiz G; Silvestre FJ; Hernández-Cortés P; Wang HL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Mar; 25(3):378-384. PubMed ID: 23421476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implant marginal bone loss in maxillary sinus grafts.
Herzberg R; Dolev E; Schwartz-Arad D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 16519188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A radiographic evaluation of cervical bone loss associated with immediate and delayed implants placed for fixed restorations in edentulous jaws.
Schwartz-Arad D; Yaniv Y; Levin L; Kaffe I
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 15212346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal bone loss in dental implants subjected to early loading (6 to 8 weeks postplacement) with a retrospective short-term follow-up.
Boronat A; Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Marti E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 18201603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of crestal bone loss and implant stability among the implants placed with conventional procedure and using osteotome technique: a clinical study.
Padmanabhan TV; Gupta RK
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 21142790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiological and clinical follow-up of machined- and anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months.
Watzak G; Zechner W; Busenlechner D; Arnhart C; Gruber R; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):651-7. PubMed ID: 17092223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths.
Hänggi MP; Hänggi DC; Schoolfield JD; Meyer J; Cochran DL; Hermann JS
J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):791-802. PubMed ID: 15898941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate and early non-occlusal loading of Straumann implants with a chemically modified surface (SLActive) in the posterior mandible and maxilla: interim results from a prospective multicenter randomized-controlled study.
Zöllner A; Ganeles J; Korostoff J; Guerra F; Krafft T; Brägger U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 18416725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peri-implant soft tissue and bone crest alterations at fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year prospective study.
Chang M; Wennström JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 20443804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcome analysis of immediately placed, immediately restored implants in the esthetic area: the clinical relevance of different interimplant distances.
Degidi M; Novaes AB; Nardi D; Piattelli A
J Periodontol; 2008 Jun; 79(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 18533783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective radiographic analysis of bone loss following placement of TiO2 grit-blasted implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
Warren P; Chaffee N; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 12074456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Turned Brånemark System implants in wide and narrow edentulous maxillae: a retrospective clinical study.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 18462203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do angulated implants increase the amount of bone loss around implants in the anterior maxilla?
Tabrizi R; Pourdanesh F; Zare S; Daneste H; Zeini N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 23351760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiological evaluation of single implants in maxillary anterior sites with special emphasis on their relation to adjacent teeth: a 3-year follow-up study.
Vilhjálmsson VH; Klock KS; Størksen K; Bårdsen A
Dent Traumatol; 2013 Feb; 29(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 22712441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
