490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17539785)
1. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Salim S; Du H; Wan J
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparison of I Care rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelium keratoplasty].
Li BZ; Hong J; Peng RM; Wang X; Ren J; Wu LL
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 49(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23866708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The utility of rebound tonometer in late elderly subjects.
Sakata R; Numaga J
Clin Interv Aging; 2014; 9():227-32. PubMed ID: 24489462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness.
Porwal AC; Shrishrimal M; Punamia RP; Mathew BC
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1927-1931. PubMed ID: 37203058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on the intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometer and ocular blood flow pneumatonometer.
Saleh TA; Adams M; McDermott B; Claridge KG; Ewings P
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 34(6):516-20. PubMed ID: 16925697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Rebound tonometry in a clinical setting. Comparison with applanation tonometry].
López-Caballero C; Contreras I; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G; Cabrejas L; Marcelo P
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2007 May; 82(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 17516263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comprasion of ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in high myopia.
Cagatay HH; Ekinci M; Yazar Z; Gokce G; Ceylan E
ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():869460. PubMed ID: 25379549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of goldmann applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry measurements among patients attending a glaucoma clinic in Southwest Nigeria.
Ashano O; Oderinlo O; Ogunro A; Ashano E
Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 36149217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured by tono-pen and rebound tonometer in children.
Sahin A; Basmak H; Yildirim N
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18303387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Application of Icare rebound tonometer in children after congenital cataract surgery].
Li Y; Jia S; Liu P; Xiao M; Wei X; Tang L; Xia K
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jan; 40(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 25652385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L
J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 16778643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Vandewalle E; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I; Zeyen T
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
Barleon L; Hoffmann EM; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
