56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17544418)
1. Cost Removed! Do Different Factors Influence Motivation for Vasectomy Reversal When Cost Is Not an Issue?
Maloney TJ; Swargaloganathan P; Hawksworth DJ
Mil Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38870065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The optimal design of assisted reproductive technologies policies.
Leroux ML; Pestieau P; Ponthiere G
Health Econ; 2024 Jul; 33(7):1454-1479. PubMed ID: 38475875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Markov Modeling Approaches to Understand the Impact of Infertility Treatments.
Rao ASRS; Diamond MP
Reprod Sci; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1538-1543. PubMed ID: 29017436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Office-based andrology and male infertility procedures-a cost-effective alternative.
Alom M; Ziegelmann M; Savage J; Miest T; Köhler TS; Trost L
Transl Androl Urol; 2017 Aug; 6(4):761-772. PubMed ID: 28904909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vasectomy Reversal must be the first step for a man who had a vasectomy and wants a children from a new marriage? Opinion: Yes.
Vieira M
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(6):1043-5. PubMed ID: 26717115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Interventions That Affect Fertility and Childbearing: How Health Effects Are Measured Matters.
Goldhaber-Fiebert JD; Brandeau ML
Med Decis Making; 2015 Oct; 35(7):818-46. PubMed ID: 25926281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Review of Azoospermia.
Wosnitzer M; Goldstein M; Hardy MP
Spermatogenesis; 2014; 4():e28218. PubMed ID: 25105055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques.
Chan PT
Asian J Androl; 2013 Jan; 15(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 23160266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.
Lopushnyan NA; Walsh TJ
Asian J Androl; 2012 Jan; 14(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 22120932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical treatment of male infertility in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection - new insights.
Esteves SC; Miyaoka R; Agarwal A
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2011; 66(8):1463-78. PubMed ID: 21915501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update.
Ramasamy R; Schlegel PN
Indian J Urol; 2011 Jan; 27(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 21716894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Markov modeling: questionable data in, questionable data out.
Olive DL; Pritts EA
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):746-7. PubMed ID: 18331869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal.
Gerrard ER; Sandlow JI; Oster RA; Burns JR; Box LC; Kolettis PN
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1340-4. PubMed ID: 17258213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization: a contemporary, comparative analysis.
Dubin JM; White J; Ory J; Ramasamy R
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 34053510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Necrospermia, antisperm antibodies, and vasectomy.
Chavez-Badiola A; Drakeley AJ; Finney V; Sajjad Y; Lewis-Jones DI
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):723.e5-7. PubMed ID: 17612533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Markov modeling of vasectomy reversal and ART for infertility: how do obstructive interval and female partner age influence cost effectiveness?
Hsieh MH; Meng MV; Turek PJ
Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 17544418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility.
Meng MV; Greene KL; Turek PJ
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1926-31; discussion 1931. PubMed ID: 16217347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
