56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17544418)
21. Markov modeling: questionable data in, questionable data out.
Olive DL; Pritts EA
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):746-7. PubMed ID: 18331869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of female partner age on pregnancy rates after vasectomy reversal.
Gerrard ER; Sandlow JI; Oster RA; Burns JR; Box LC; Kolettis PN
Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1340-4. PubMed ID: 17258213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia.
Lee R; Li PS; Goldstein M; Tanrikut C; Schattman G; Schlegel PN
Hum Reprod; 2008 Sep; 23(9):2043-9. PubMed ID: 18556680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fertility rates following vasectomy reversal: importance of age of the female partner.
Hinz S; Rais-Bahrami S; Kempkensteffen C; Weiske WH; Schrader M; Magheli A
Urol Int; 2008; 81(4):416-20. PubMed ID: 19077402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Markov modeling of vasectomy reversal and ART for infertility: how do obstructive interval and female partner age influence cost effectiveness?
Hsieh MH; Meng MV; Turek PJ
Fertil Steril; 2007 Oct; 88(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 17544418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Vasectomy reversal vs. sperm retrieval with in vitro fertilization: a contemporary, comparative analysis.
Dubin JM; White J; Ory J; Ramasamy R
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 34053510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Necrospermia, antisperm antibodies, and vasectomy.
Chavez-Badiola A; Drakeley AJ; Finney V; Sajjad Y; Lewis-Jones DI
Fertil Steril; 2008 Mar; 89(3):723.e5-7. PubMed ID: 17612533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vasectomy reversal versus IVF with sperm retrieval: which is better?
Shridharani A; Sandlow JI
Curr Opin Urol; 2010 Nov; 20(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 20852426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Female age in ART: when to stop?
Broekmans FJ; Klinkert ER
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2004; 58(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 15361703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reversal of vasectomy using a macroscopic technique: a retrospective study.
Mason RG; Connell PG; Bull JC
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1997 Nov; 79(6):420-2. PubMed ID: 9422867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ageing and ART: a waste of time and money?
Ng EH; Ho PC
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 17049459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cost-effectiveness of vasectomy reversal.
Robb P; Sandlow JI
Urol Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 36(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 19643241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The best infertility treatment for vasectomized men: assisted reproduction or vasectomy reversal?
Pasqualotto FF; Lucon AM; Sobreiro BP; Pasqualotto EB; Arap S
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo; 2004 Oct; 59(5):312-5. PubMed ID: 15543406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Current status of vasectomy reversal.
Schwarzer JU; Steinfatt H
Nat Rev Urol; 2013 Apr; 10(4):195-205. PubMed ID: 23399733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Vasectomy reversal: new techniques and role in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Karpman E; Williams DH; Lipshultz LI
Can J Urol; 2006 Feb; 13 Suppl 1():22-7. PubMed ID: 16526977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Why treat the male in the era of assisted reproduction?
Alukal JP; Lipshultz LI
Semin Reprod Med; 2009 Mar; 27(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 19247912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vasectomy as a reversible form of contraception for select patients.
Samplaski MK; Daniel A; Jarvi K
Can J Urol; 2014 Apr; 21(2):7234-40. PubMed ID: 24775578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Acceptable cost for the patient and society.
Chambers GM; Adamson GD; Eijkemans MJ
Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 23905708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The evolution of vasectomy reversal.
Dickey RM; Pastuszak AW; Hakky TS; Chandrashekar A; Ramasamy R; Lipshultz LI
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Jun; 16(6):40. PubMed ID: 25980804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Heterotopic pregnancy: two cases and a comparative review.
Barrenetxea G; Barinaga-Rementeria L; Lopez de Larruzea A; Agirregoikoa JA; Mandiola M; Carbonero K
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):417.e9-15. PubMed ID: 17074353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
