308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17544555)
1. Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Aug; 22(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 17544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis.
Radcliffe IA; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 17270328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of femur size and morphology on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: A large scale, multi-subject finite element study.
Bryan R; Nair PB; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2012 Jul; 45(11):1952-8. PubMed ID: 22704609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biomechanical consequence of insufficient femoral component lateralization and exposed cancellous bone in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Davis ET; Whyne CM; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Aug; 132(8):081011. PubMed ID: 20670060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
Long JP; Bartel DL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.
Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1522-7. PubMed ID: 18978277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of positioning and notching of resurfaced femurs on femoral neck strength: a biomechanical test.
Nabavi A; Yeoh KM; Shidiac L; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Turnbull A
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 19398793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of suitable sample sizes for multi-patient based finite element studies.
Radcliffe IA; Prescott P; Man HS; Taylor M
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Dec; 29(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17218146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mechanical analysis of femoral resurfacing implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Sakagoshi D; Kabata T; Umemoto Y; Sakamoto J; Tomita K
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 19879726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of proximal femoral morphology on failure strength with a mid-head resection short-stem hip arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Al Saied M; Morison Z; Sellan M; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1275-80. PubMed ID: 25515228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 May; 223(4):471-84. PubMed ID: 19499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development of a computational stress analysis of the femoral head. Mapping tensile, compressive, and shear stress for the varus and valgus positions.
Brown TD; Ferguson AB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1978 Jul; 60(5):619-29. PubMed ID: 681380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads.
Little JP; Taddei F; Viceconti M; Murray DW; Gill HS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 17257719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
