These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1754617)

  • 1. Forces acting in the direction of propagation in pulsed ultrasound fields.
    Starritt HC; Duck FA; Humphrey VF
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Nov; 36(11):1465-74. PubMed ID: 1754617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical analysis for transverse microbead trapping using 30 MHz focused ultrasound in ray acoustics regime.
    Lee J
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 23809757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the acoustic streaming in amniotic fluid and water in medical ultrasonic beams.
    Zauhar G; Duck FA; Starritt HC
    Ultraschall Med; 2006 Apr; 27(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 16612724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound transducers using acoustic streaming.
    Hariharan P; Myers MR; Robinson RA; Maruvada SH; Sliwa J; Banerjee RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1706-19. PubMed ID: 18345858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Obstetrical ultrasound: can the fetus hear the wave and feel the heat?].
    Abramowicz JS; Kremkau FW; Merz E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 22700164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic Streaming in a Soft Tissue Microenvironment.
    El Ghamrawy A; de Comtes F; Koruk H; Mohammed A; Jones JR; Choi JJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):208-217. PubMed ID: 30336964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of non-linear propagation in water due to diagnostic medical ultrasound equipment.
    Baker AC
    Phys Med Biol; 1991 Nov; 36(11):1457-64. PubMed ID: 1754616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of nonlinear ultrasound propagation on high intensity brain therapy.
    Pinton G; Aubry JF; Fink M; Tanter M
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1207-16. PubMed ID: 21520833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of ultrasonic field propagation through layered media using the extended angular spectrum method.
    Vecchio CJ; Schafer ME; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(7):611-22. PubMed ID: 7810021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Possible explanation for the unexpected absence of gross biological damage to membranes of cells insonated in suspension and in surface culture in chambers exposed to standing and progressive wave fields.
    Watmough DJ; Quan KM; Shiran MB
    Ultrasonics; 1990 May; 28(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 2339471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FDTD simulation of finite-amplitude pressure and temperature fields for biomedical ultrasound.
    Hallaj IM; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):L7-12. PubMed ID: 10335650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterisation of flow behaviour and velocity induced by ultrasound using particle image velocimetry (PIV): Effect of fluid rheology, acoustic intensity and transducer tip size.
    O'Sullivan JJ; Espinoza CJU; Mihailova O; Alberini F
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2018 Nov; 48():218-230. PubMed ID: 30080545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces.
    Muller PB; Barnkob R; Jensen MJ; Bruus H
    Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4617-27. PubMed ID: 23010952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Thermal effects generated by high-intensity focused ultrasound beams at normal incidence to a bone surface.
    Nell DM; Myers MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):549-59. PubMed ID: 20059000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two theoretical models for predicting non-linear propagation in medical ultrasound fields.
    Bacon DR; Baker AC
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1633-43. PubMed ID: 2685835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of acoustic streaming using magnetic resonance.
    Starritt HC; Hoad CL; Duck FA; Nassiri DK; Summers IR; Vennart W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Feb; 26(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 10722922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method for Estimating the Acoustic Pressure in Tissues Using Low-Amplitude Measurements in Water.
    Keravnou CP; Izamis ML; Averkiou MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):3001-12. PubMed ID: 26320668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation of nonlinear Westervelt equation for the investigation of acoustic streaming and nonlinear propagation effects.
    Solovchuk M; Sheu TW; Thiriet M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3931-42. PubMed ID: 24180802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics of the pulsed ultrasound field.
    Wien KD; Harder D
    Br J Cancer Suppl; 1982 Mar; 5():59-63. PubMed ID: 6950776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of acoustic streaming on ultrasonic heating.
    Wu J; Winkler AJ; O'Neill TP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 8023432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.