These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17546462)

  • 1. The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks.
    Wendt M; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 17546462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit task sets in task switching?
    Dreisbach G; Goschke T; Haider H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1221-33. PubMed ID: 17087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning through instructions vs. learning through practice: flanker congruency effects from instructed and applied S-R mappings.
    Wenke D; De Houwer J; De Winne J; Liefooghe B
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):899-912. PubMed ID: 26511962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training.
    Berryhill ME; Hughes HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the representation of task information in task switching: evidence from task and dimension switching.
    Vandierendonck A; Christiaens E; Liefooghe B
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1248-61. PubMed ID: 18927041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of recent practice on task switching.
    Yeung N; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):919-36. PubMed ID: 14585014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task switching under predictable and unpredictable circumstances.
    Andreadis N; Quinlan PT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1776-90. PubMed ID: 20952777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple response codes play specific roles in response selection and inhibition under task switching.
    Hübner R; Druey MD
    Psychol Res; 2008 Jul; 72(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 17534655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A role for set in the control of automatic spatial response activation.
    Risko EF; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18271352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence on Simon and SNARC effects of a nonspatial stimulus-response mapping: between-task logical recoding.
    Treccani B; Milanese N; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1239-54. PubMed ID: 20731514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?
    Huckauf A; Knops A; Nuerk HC; Willmes K
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 18841386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response execution, selection, or activation: what is sufficient for response-related repetition effects under task shifting?
    Hübner R; Druey MD
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jul; 70(4):245-61. PubMed ID: 16151720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions.
    Cohen-Kdoshay O; Meiran N
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 19261588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assembling a task space: global determination of local shift costs.
    Kleinsorge T; Heuer H; Schmidtke V
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 12774231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial congruency between stimulus presentation and response key arrangements in arithmetic fact retrieval.
    Fabbri M
    Am J Psychol; 2011; 124(3):325-40. PubMed ID: 21977694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.